this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
1067 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

74566 readers
4247 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tlf@feddit.org 9 points 14 hours ago (4 children)
[–] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 hours ago

I went from 15 years of iPhones directly to Graphene, without really messing with Android in between, so my experience has been a STEEP learning curve, followed by a fairly hum-drum experience. But honestly, that's fine. I want my phone to take more of a back seat and not be something I keep needing to worry about.

My banking app doesn't work in Graphene, but the website does, so I don't really mind.

It could that there's a whole bunch of shit I'm missing, but mostly it's... fine.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

It's very "meh..." with the added benefit of several (non-google) apps not working (/s). I choose to live with this inconvenience, but it still bothers me that my smartphone is significantly less useful in my daily life.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Honestly, smart phones being less useful in daily life is probably a good thing.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

You always have a choice. You can ditch your morals entirely, give up, be subservient to the capitalists and give your identity over fully to the system like the good little consumer slave you are and enjoy your normie life looking at your normie phone and toss us all out as tinfoil-hatted weirdos who almost convinced you to make your life worse for the sake of self-sufficiency, independence and privacy.

No one in the real world will ever know, care, or judge you. Only you will know that you gave up, that every location you exist in is known about by someone behind a monitor being overseen by fascists. Every day! You can live with that, right? That's a small thing to give up in the grand scheme of things, isn't it? At least Youtube loaded today, right? It's all worth it, lol.

Just remember to type "thanks" in google keyboard whenever you want them to know you appreciate them. They log it.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Oh yes I forgot that pointing out the flaws in privacy-related things, so people who are interested in switching know what they're potentially getting in to, is a big NoNo here...all hail the perfect FOSS which can do no wrong.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The purity tests are so exhausting

[–] ILikePigeons@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

Yup, privacy (and many other things) should be done to ones ability and not to ability of others.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Don't feel pressured by me. If you feel pressured yourself, it may be a form of projected guilt.

If you don't find privacy and security important enough to give up your connectivity or usability, that's perfectly fine. I don't have to live with it.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Dead Kennedys were prophetic when they named one of their albums "Give me convenience or give me death".

[–] markko@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Having not used default Android for many years now, what makes GrapheneOS worse (aside from a few apps not working - which isn't an issue I've had, fortunately)?

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

GrapheneOS is not worse than other custom ROMs, never said it was. it's a mediocre experience best described with a "meh..." and a shrug.

[–] markko@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, I was asking about GrapheneOS vs stock Android. I assumed that your comments on it were in comparison to stock Android since that's what the previous user most likely was asking for.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

The answer is the same, very average.

[–] 2deck@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

Yes, ive had zero issues with it 👍

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You have to pay google to use it (only works on pixel phones afaik).

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

There's a thriving used market with significant discounts if you're willing to go 1-2 models back from the latest ones.