this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
517 points (97.3% liked)

Fuck AI

4728 readers
629 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
517
What is the biggest number? (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Lemminary@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
86 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Image transcription

“what is the biggest number”

AI Overview

The biggest number in the world is so big that mathematicians don't even think it exists.

Top 5 biggest numbers, according to me.

  1. 5
  2. 1 Million
  3. 100 Billion
  4. 999 Trillion
  5. Brazillian

Original post: https://xcancel.com/ChatgptLunatics/status/1995441330986598532

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] potatoguy@lemmy.eco.br 17 points 3 days ago (4 children)

i'm sorry tree(3)

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

ahem.

Brazillian?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Best I can do is 3.50.

[–] mtpender@piefed.social 10 points 3 days ago

"God damn Loch Ness monster!"

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I always liked Graham's Number. I didn't like that it was TREE(1)=1, TREE(2)=3, and TREE(3) dwarfs even Graham's Number. At least G=g_64 which is built up from g_1.

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

TREE(g_64)

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Motherofgod.jpg

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You just sent me down a rabbit hole learning about TREE(3), thank you