this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
25 points (93.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3514 readers
395 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
simsymbiote@midwest.social
Type1@midwest.social
exposingfash@midwest.social
25
Hillary Clinton says TikTok to blame for young Americans' pro-Palestine views. (www.middleeasteye.net)
submitted 2 days ago by cm0002@lemmings.world to c/usa@midwest.social
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hillary Clinton is facing a deluge of criticism after stating that young Americans' growing support for Palestinians is influenced by "totally made-up" videos on TikTok and suggesting that American youth - including young Jews - "don't know history and don't understand" Israel's war on Gaza.

Speaking on Tuesday at a summit hosted by the right-wing Israeli paper Israel Hayom in New York City, the former Democratic presidential candidate expressed her concerns that “smart, well-educated young people” in America and around the world are getting a lot of their information, including about Israel and Palestine, from social media platforms like TikTok.

The former US secretary of state described it as "serious problem for democracy", remarking that when she attempted to have "reasonable discussions" with young people, it was challenging because “they did not know history, they had very little context, and what they were being told on social media was not just one-sided, it was pure propaganda".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SmokeInFog@midwest.social 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm not trying to dis your post but:

Hillary Clinton is a bad person with all kinds of bad opinions. Is she still truly influencing policy, though? Is she an important bellwether on something? Or is this an article that's basically like, "Hey! Remember that shitty person who used to be in politics like a decade ago? Yeah, they're still alive, still shitty, and I bet you're sorry I reminded you they exist!"

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

She's still a powerful voice in the Democratic Party and I wouldn't be surprised to see her in a primary again

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

She represents the democratic party establishment which is certainly still influencing policy and, as far as I know, has made no attempts to distance itself from her. Even speaking at this event reflects terribly on the party.