this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
299 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck AI

4728 readers
1107 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Look at this shit (first paragraph of body of article):

"Automatic watches are admired for their intricate mechanics and timeless appeal, but even the finest timepieces can sometimes run fast or slow. If you’ve noticed your automatic watch gaining or losing time, you’re not."

First search result on DDG. Thank you, automatic watch expert and real person Hnin Oo Thazin. We may need a whole ass new internet.

https://mtscwatch.com/blog/why-your-automatic-watch-runs-fast-or-slow-and-how-to-fix-it

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (4 children)
[–] sleepundertheleaves@infosec.pub 2 points 5 hours ago

Yes, and, please don't use old canning and preserving recipes as written. Not all of those recipes were safe. People died of botulism regularly. And some recipes that used to be safe aren't safe anymore because of changes in technology, in ingredients, in chemicals available, and so on.

For example: it used to be you didn't need to add acid to tomatoes when canning them, because tomatoes are pretty acidic already. (Acidic foods are safer to can because botulism and other particularly nasty bacteria can't grow in acidic environments.) But modern tomato varieties are less acidic than the old varieties were, so modern canned tomato recipes have you add lemon juice to increase acidity.

The USDA Guide to Home Canning (most recent edition 2015) is safe and reliable and is available free online.

[–] sleepundertheleaves@infosec.pub 1 points 5 hours ago

God. The first line of the preface to that book is:

In this age of adulteration we know not what we eat

We keep making the same mistakes, don't we?

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Thanks for this, saved so I can access it offline. There's a lot to be said for tested, proven methods even if they're not exciting foods sometimes. My (70yr old) aunt made some canned chicken that looked extremely questionable a few years back. It was canned in its own broth so ended up being encased in a disgusting chicken gelatin. But I fuck with canned meats I'll try it.

Once we finally got around to using it we were a little sad we hadn't sooner. It was some of the tenderest most flavorful, real chicken I'd ever had.

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

The problem with old old recipes is they haven't been tested probably uh, ever. Ball/Kerr has a good website with tested recipes, as does the National Center for Home Food Preservation, which are the two sites I know are considered safe (well I consider safe??).

That book is very very cool in the "Damn I love old books" way though!