this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
1538 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74799 readers
2835 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 20 points 5 days ago (3 children)

You need a certain critical mass to enter this market, since you need to be able to get an army of Foxconn slaves to produce the handsets.

No company is going to be and to swoop in and eat those two's lunches.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Hell, even the juggernauts of Microsoft and Amazon tried, and they got crushed out of the market.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Microsoft was already an established player in the smartphone market when the iPhone came out. It was Apple who came into the market and ate the lunches of MS and Blackberry.

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

I kind of feel like MS tried three distinct times, first with their WinMo products pre-Apple, then with their Nokia partnership, then finally with one last push through the mid-10's before Intel finally made x86 on mobile an impossibility (nuking the Atom line, selling their 5G modem business to Apple, etc) and before there just weren't any paths forward for MS.

Amazon and FB having their own phone product lines felt like the weirdest me-too-also-ran Android reskins to extend their own walled gardens, but also felt like both threw in the towel after like 18 months?!?

MS had to be a loser for more than a decade before they gave up. They were really great at being a big loser.

It's just .. apparent that nobody is going to do this for the love of the game, and that they can only get minimum market presence by financing their way to launching yet another walled garden ecosystem. Which is exactly what we all want to avoid in this group.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Honestly I think they could if they actually invested in it hard enough but they just half ass it and are surprised when it fails

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Microsoft spent billions and even bought Nokia to try and be a 3rd player. The problem wasn’t their commitment, it was a lack of developers releasing apps for their OS. Without the millions of apps available on iOS and Android, people weren’t buying the phones.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah they would have to actively pay for things to get ported to their ecosystem and work with developers to do facilitate that.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

An investment that big would be a huge risk they aren't willing to take. But half assing it ensures failure.

[–] kayazere@feddit.nl 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

You also need every company to develop for a third mobile platform, where two different ones are already a big ask.

Easy solution would be to run existing apps on Linux, probably would be Android.

Another solution would we move to PWAs to have apps in the browser.

Both these things already happened on desktop Linux with Windows games using Proton and most proprietary desktop apps switching to Electron.

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Honest question - why not fork android which already has all of the infrastructure needed for things like 5G handling, power management, and a widely supported ecosystem of components and vendors?

I would try a Linux phone, absolutely, but why not just Android instead?

The issue is current and future vendors for current and future Android phones are largely tainted and lockstep with Google.

But wouldn't developing off yesteryear Android still be leap years ahead of just reinventing the wheel around Linux? I kinda thought Android was Linux for our devices.

I'm mostly saying this just because I'm jealous to bring all of my APK's with me into that future.

I don't want to give up my reddit app and my current trio of browsers.

[–] mnhs1@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

At this point, I just need a community device. And I’ll gladly pay monthly for an OS that has the basics with a web browser and full privacy.

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

If Reddit Old would play nice with said device, and doesn't have a native app, I probably will settle on that when my ReVanced 3rd-party-Boost finally dies. (I also use the same developer's Boost for Lemmy app).

I already use Amazon in one browser instead of its app, and Facebook in a whole separate browser on my device, even.

But there are apps on in daily, like my brokerage account and my budget/financial app (Monarch Money is worth the subscription, for me).

I would absolutely pay for access to