this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
80 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10911 readers
1278 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
otter@piefed.ca
mp3@piefed.ca
80
The Case for Sticking Around (albertaviews.ca)
submitted 2 weeks ago by streetfestival@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

By Senator Paula Simons

So I’m calling on us to do something un-Canadian: to put aside our habitual self-deprecation and stand up for the country we love—and reject the idea of a sovereign Alberta whose founding principles seem to be miserliness, xenophobia and transphobia. We need to raise our voices to denounce the dark fantasy of a landlocked, petulant petrostate dedicated to hoarding wealth, denouncing immigrants, denying climate change, spurning vaccines, protecting patriarchy and endangering queer kids. Because Alberta’s current crop of separatists don’t just want to leave Canada. They seem to want to opt out of the 21st century entirely.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Neither. Albertans overwhelmingly think the idea is dumb. The far-right party in power, on the other hand...

The Quebec thing is as old as Canada. We basically started as two British colonies, one ethnically American and one ethnically French/Acadian, and we were forced together to fend off the US. The French half, being smaller, was always extra uncomfortable with this, and came very close to voting to leave in the 90's. Currently the idea of separating is waning in Quebec, though.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Notably, in the "close" referendum, polls at the indicated many (the majority, I think?) of "leave" voters thought they would still be using Canadian money, still be part of the Canadian military, and thought there wouldn't be a border crossing/customs to travel to other provinces.

Sounds very similar to what's happening in Alberta, except that it's not at all close.

There was also the Clarity Act that explicitly requires much more precise language in any future separation referendums. Alberta is explicitly not pursuing a referendum right now, and the cynic in me expects that's because the Clarity Act would make a referendum result laughable at best. And risk causing a schism in the already-wobbly ~~Wild Rose~~ Alberta Cons Party.

The House of Commons must decide if the referendum question is clear and unambiguous, asking directly about secession. (emphasis mine)

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Albertans overwhelmingly think the idea is dumb

Alberta voted 92% for Pierre Poilievre's party when Canada's sovereignty was threatened. I'm fed up with these "that's only a minority" posts.

AB would join the US in heartbeat. This should be the new map of canada:

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's only a minority.

PP doesn't say we should join the US himself, why would literally everyone who voted for him?

Certain other provinces aren't looking so great by that measure. And most of Canada, by land area.