People Twitter

8123 readers

588 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1398

People like to create things (media.piefed.world)

submitted 3 days ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

168 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

ok, so this post indicates that you are basically grabbing any "common idea" about art wholesale, not interpreting any of it, and regurgitating it. There is no actual interaction to be had here, nor logic being processed.

Bye.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nope. I actually used to argue with snobby people who would call something not art if they didn't personally get it. You're just wrong here. You understand the point I'm making but you won't acknowledge it. Had you said "the AI process could be creative if..." you might get some conditional agreement. But what you're instead doing is lazily saying "well photos are technical and so is this so BAM: art."

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

had you said “the AI process could be creative if…” you might get some conditional agreement. But what you’re instead doing is lazily saying “well photos are technical and so is this so BAM: art.”

I'll bite :

AI art is art when you have an actual vision and feeling you are trying to express, and you lack the craftmanship to be able to do it through traditional mediums and use prose, which itself is art, to get a tool to assist you in rendering out that vision and feeling you have. It's a bit less direct than traditional creativity, but it's fun and fulfilling, and that's the entire point of art in the first place.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, writing the prompt could be art of a kind. But I would challenge the claim that it's fun and fulfilling. Maybe it is for some people, but almost certainly not for any traditional artist.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Maybe it is for some people, but almost certainly not for any traditional artist.

if you are a traditional artist, of course it's not. But if you are not, then it is more gratifying than making a crude stick figure that doesn't have the same emotional impact or resemblance to the idea you have in your head.