this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
784 points (99.7% liked)

Political Memes

9372 readers
2473 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe not explicitly, but pretty much every Trump supporter has told them to stfu, in so many words

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Telling them to STFU obligates them not to exercise their free speech? I don't see where that gags anyone.

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Again, maybe not explicitly. They're covering for pedophiles. I'm sure you're ok with that

I guarantee you missed any nuance in this comic. It's ok, adults are talking

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

They’re covering for pedophiles. I’m sure you’re ok with that

Consequentialist fallacy: outcomes have no bearing on whether a conclusion logically follows from premises.
fallacy referee meme: appeal to consequences

Circular reasoning: the outcome assumes your conclusion (that STFU can suppress freedom of speech, which is unsupported) is true.
fallacy referee meme: begging the question

Freedom of speech means you can tell anyone to STFU, and they're free to speak regardless.

Moreover, as widely reported in the press, the communities who promoted rightwing conspiracy theories about Jeffery Epstein (extracted from more general conspiracy theories that a shadowy cabal of deep state elites runs pedophile rings to harvest adrenochrome) are the Trump voters. They're the Trump supporters with a longer record than anyone of pushing for the release of those files. Top officials like Kash Patel & Dan Bondingo sprang right out of that community.

It’s ok, adults are talking

Condescension, and we should expect adults to respect logic. Are you an adult? If so, that's unfortunate.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You need a foundation in what freedom of speech is and then pair that with the complicated reality we are facing. Your definition of freedom of speech is nonsensical at best.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Define freedom of speech. This is not a hard question.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Freedom of speech refers to government action in public space to suppress speech it does not agree with.

For instance, in our colleges there was some pro-palestine demonstrations. In Florida the government issued a decree to disband SJC. This is classic suppression of free speech because it involves a government action in a public space.

Because we live in a fascist oligarchy though it becomes complicated because corporations simultaneously are controlled and control the government. This merger of the state and corporations complicates the simple definition of freedom of speech.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 5 hours ago

It's freedom from legal (or government) sanction, censorship, or retaliation for expressing opinions or ideas.

Because we live in a fascist oligarchy

corporations simultaneously are controlled and control the government

That's a stretch. Where was that government control of private companies during the Biden administration or previous administrations dating back to the beginning of the Epstein crimes? Is the government controlling MSNBC, New York Times, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS? Private companies aren't legal authorities, and they aren't legally obligated to repeat or broadcast anyone's speech: that's how social media nowadays defends deplatforming. Would your claim mean that deplatforming suppresses free speech?

Trump supporters saying STFU doesn't amount to legal sanctions. I've only seen the Trump administration evade, deny, or deflect. Where are the legal sanctions suppressing the speech of Epstein victims?