this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
259 points (99.6% liked)

Canada

11742 readers
710 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Polymarket odds at time A can be very different from at time B. Prediction markets, like other markets, are not efficient. If they were, nobody would make any money in them.

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you think probability can't change over time you need to learn about Bayesianism.

Manifold predicts generally better than Polymarket, but Polymarket is still quite accurate, accurate enough that I doubt I could do better myself, and doubt most people could do better.

Obviously an efficient prediction market should have accurate predictors make money off of less accurate predictors. Not sure what you mean by that.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'll take my Grossman-Stiglitz over your EMH any day.

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well I don't claim that there can't be a better way to make predictions. I'm only claiming that if there exists a better way, it's not widely available.

But hey, I invite to you to put your money where you mouth is. If you can do better than Polymarket, why don't you go ahead and make some money off it?