this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
336 points (96.9% liked)

Funny

13099 readers
1086 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Proper winter tires in the worst of conditions are 99% what you need.

Studs come in to play in rare situations.

Source: grew up driving on ice all winter. Not "snow", just ice. Eventually found Nokian Haakapaliita tires (Finnish), even the worst over-powered, open-diff, FWD car suddenly goes (and turns, and stops) in the worst conditions.

I refuse to use any other tire for winter.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 4 days ago

70% of cars here use studded tires. they're very useful in wet ice or black ice conditions, which happen a lot here.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Why do my taxes keep going up to fix the roads? I guess we'll never know.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

probably because they do it wrong

studded tires are a legal requirement here in some parts of the country and the roads are no worse for it

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

here the main takeaway from studies is that the fewer cars have studded tires, the smoother the road surface becomes, which increases the amount of accidents in bad weather. if less than 50% of cars use studded tires the roads become too smooth in winter.

https://www.tidningendacksnack.se/teknik/e/1272/dubbdackens-roll-och-paverkan-en-balansgang-mellan-sakerhet-och-miljo/

[–] guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is there any difference if people use tire chains instead of studded tires?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 4 days ago

chains are worse for the road and can also come loose at high speed. they're for getting unstuck, not for general driving.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, but American statistics aren't fully relevant to their comment. Sweden has much more rigorous laws and controls regarding tires, and a particular difference is also rules regarding the stud length and depth.

Yes, our studded tires still damage the roads a bit more than "normal" tires, but it's not an astronomical difference. The lifesaving and healthcare costs associated with studded tires weighs significantly higher. Your life is considered much more expendable in the US as well, so of course they say you shouldn't use studded tires on ice... whereas our government research institute says you absolutely should.

I also assume the US uses really cheap asfalt or something? Or because of higher speed limits? Worse driving styles: intensive speed changes instead of calm tempo driving? Despite like 65% of cars using studded tires here, I've seen less road work here in my entire life than during a single year in the US. Dunno.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you've got hate in your heart let it out

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 0 points 4 days ago

Huh? I'm confused, where exactly was I hateful?

Disappointed, perhaps? Especially considering that the only two accidents I've been in during my entire life have been idiots with "ice and snow" (non-studded) tyres ice-skating into the back of my car.

[–] rImITywR@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Because they are spending it on roads, not public transit.