this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
3 points (100.0% liked)

196

5560 readers
1971 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anzo@programming.dev 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Omg, this turned out to be a thread with plenty explanations to USians that societies have laws, police, judges...

You can blame the orange guy all you want, but your culture is completely derailed. Murder (under whatever "reasons") can't be a national sport.

Weapon manufacturers really did a good job in the land of the free..

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I mean obviously the gun laws are insane but the act of collectively beating the shit out of pickpockets has my respect.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Violent retribution as a core principle might contribute to your completely insane murder rates.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Man, people should have a right to defend their shit. The idea that someone should be allowed to take your things in front of you and you should be charged if you beat them up is pretty unhinged tbh

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Man, it's just shit. Life should be of higher value than an object, even if it's a really cool object or useful. You beating someone for taking something is a bigger problem then things being taken. You can't commit a crime because someone else also committed a crime first. Get it?

Quite simply, that should be the thief's decision to make. It's their risk to undertake, it was their decision to make that choice to rob and steal.

You can't commit a crime because someone else also committed a crime first. Get it?

Legality is not morality.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I fully disagree and enjoy living in a society free of such barbaric tendencies.

Make your people happy and maybe they'll stop stealing your shit.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There are people who steal no matter how wealthy or comfortable they are. Theft is not stopped by making people happy. Reduced significantly, yes. But absolutely not stopped. Wage theft is the largest form of theft in the world, done exclusively by the better off and rich. Never forget that

(And yes, I'm saying that people should have the right to beat up their employers to get back their stolen money)

[–] bigpEE@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Where do you live? I want your shit

Not rhetorical, I personally want your shit

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I bet you would, but assuming you're American, you'll never get anywhere close to it

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Where is that? Turkmenistan? Russia? Bhutan?

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's Denmark. Let's compare literally any statistic and see how your third world country fares

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 7 months ago

Americans can travel to Denmark visa free, watch out, BigPee is coming to steal your shit.

[–] anzo@programming.dev 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)

What about a pickpocket that stole a stupid iPhone from a rich teen who would get a new one the very next day? And, in some less frequent cases, the pickpocket may have had actual needs like buying medicine..

That's the reason we have a judicial system. Not even police are supposed to do harm, only prevent harm and bring into justice system.

I know the system has many flaws. That's beyond the point. Those who prefer to go vigilante are calling for making it worse. Specially if we take into account the effects of inequality on a hands-on self-service judicial approach...

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 1 points 7 months ago

But the judicial system famously doesn’t differentiate between people doing what they need to for good reasons and those doing it for bad reasons…

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Are you actually defending thieves?

Why can’t the pickpocket go get a job and buy his own damn iPhone. My stuff is mine, you try to take it and I’ll hit you. This is like basic human behavior.

How's the pickpocket to know the person in question's situation? That's one of the top justifications scammers in india use as to why they pretend what they do is reasonable. But reality is they don't know, and they don't care. They'll steal from anyone.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 1 points 7 months ago

And, in some less frequent cases, the pickpocket may have had actual needs like buying medicine…

Likewise, a pickpocketing victim may also need to buy medicine.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The saddest/funniest thing to me about this whole bit is how every. single. US. person defending their right to righteously beat the shit out of someone for picking their pocket never, ever, even considers the idea that they might lose.

It's just like gun owners in general. They all think they're a perfect shot and the other guy must be like a Storm Trooper in Star Wars and can't hit the broad side of a barn.

Everyone thinks they're the hero and that they don't need cops and laws until they're the one bleeding out in an alleyway on the verge of death because they were stupid enough to "fight back."

US Americans are completely fucking unhinged and live in a fantasy land where somehow every single one of them is the biggest and strongest with the biggest dick and will always win because their cause is righteous. What a crock of shit.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Willingness to stand up for oneself is not necessarily the same as one overestimating their ability to fight.

I was bullied regularly as a kid. I was no match at all for most of the bullies, they easily had strength, size, numbers, and fighting experience over me, but since the schools wouldn't or couldn't do a damn thing to protect me, especially when the bullies followed me well away from school grounds, the only choices I had were to either endure it, or to try to change the situation by standing up for myself. Even if I got my ass beat even worse just for standing up for myself, at the very least it made it clear to them that I was no longer guaranteed to be a frictionless target and that sometimes changes things for the better.

It's not about winning. It's about putting up the fight, because the potential outcomes of not fighting back aren't always much better than standing up for oneself.

That said, I personally wouldn't want to put a foreign trip in jeopardy by assaulting anyone if it wasn't an actual self defense situation, much like back at home. I'm just responding to this idea that willingness to fight is not the same thing as being overly confident that one will come out on top.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

and that sometimes changes things for the better.

And a lot of times it changes it for the worse, too. What even is this argument?

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 1 points 7 months ago

I don't think you understand what it's like to be constantly bullied and constantly on guard. At some point there is no concept of "worse". At some point there is only the sense of "literally anything in the world except this."