this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
655 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck AI

5268 readers
2155 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

On the traffic front, other than donations, if they don’t show ads, isn’t more traffic just more cost? So, I guess if copilot instead just shows info without the user going to wiki that might be good in a sense? But if they drove more traffic there, not so much? Unless they are donating….

I mean, I guess it’s better than ahem…. Grok with its fictitious information, but, I don’t think this of the ai_lovers community either…

You for maybe have an argument that at least the ai will be fed dates with some basis in reality, which could be good.

Many conflicting feelings

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Not when the source is paying that part of the bill, AKA the AI company (or in this case Microsoft.)

“You can plug our site into your AI models. But you need to pay the estimated cost of the increased traffic plus some odd percentage.”

I am honestly only guessing myself since greed doesn’t make sense for a non-profit foundation that is funded entirely by good will donations

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I mean you’re right, it doesn’t, but it does feel a bit bad considering all that data is mostly the work of volunteers, who now get the intense privilege of becoming AI feed.

I hate this derivative AI slop fest we are driving towards, so I guess I’m a little sensitive to news like this.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 5 points 14 hours ago

Oh indeed that there is certainly a big flaw and I hope the Wikipedia volunteers can counter that