this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
803 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

78964 readers
4428 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
803
AI boom could falter without wider adoption, Microsoft chief Satya Nadella warns (www.irishtimes.com)
submitted 1 day ago by Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
238 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Big tech boss tells delegates at Davos that broader global use is essential if technology is to deliver lasting growth

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

The way that sort of invention often works is:

  1. Inventor thinks they have a world changing idea
  2. Inventor spends their own time and money to build a prototype
  3. Inventor shows the product off to the world.

If it truly is a world changing invention, step 4 is "world is amazed, inventor can't keep up with demand". There are also frequent cases where the world goes "meh, not for me". Now occasionally those are when an invention is ahead of its time, and years or decades later the inventor is vindicated. The other case is when the invention really isn't good, and there simply isn't and will never be demand for it.

Somehow, the AI bubble is built with people ignoring the feedback from people that keep saying "meh, not for me", and the various "inventors" burning more and more of their money trying to change people's minds. Has that ever worked?