this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
347 points (92.2% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

6528 readers
2 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

[Checks]

Okay, well, TIL that the legal definition of firearm doesn't actually include flintlocks, though I'm sure that cops in the US would not bother to make that distinction before going all Judge Dredd and getting applause from bootlickers like in the original post.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For sure! It's just one of those fun little legal oddities, like the time the ATF classified a 14" string with loops on either end as a machinegun

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

On some level I appreciate when laws say 'no, really, you cannot do that, no matter how much you jump through your ass.' Like how silencers are regulated in a way where no clever horseshit workaround is tolerated; if it does the thing then that's what's verboten.

The fact you're not allowed to make your gun go BANG instead of BANG invites much less appreciation.