this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
410 points (93.2% liked)
Technology
80503 readers
4853 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Doesn't one of those companies rely on government contracts? And now that company generates CSAM on demand?
Government contracts used to be their biggest revenue source, but it's Starlink now.
They still need the profits from government contracts though to help fund the capital expenditures to try and get starship working, but they aren't reliant on them like they used to be.
Starlink has been profitable for over a year.
They are burning money trying to get starship working now.
edit: https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/spacex-generated-about-8-billion-profit-last-year-ahead-ipo-sources-say-2026-01-30/
Well it's one thing if you don't want to trust information that comes out on something like Reuters or when Glenn Shotwell said it was entering into profitability, but it's another to continue to claim something otherwise like Starlink isn't sustainable and is burning VC money.
At this point, it would be best to either stay out of the conversation, or state something more like an opinion than come across as factual.
Edit: Just as an example in the future you could say something like, "I don't think Starlink would be sustainable without the current government Starlink contracts". I don't believe we have any information that would tell us if that's the case one way or another yet and could be true. Or "I don't trust the information available, so I don't think its actually sustainable or profitable'
Edit: Just to clarify sorry for extra edits - we do know for sure that Starlink is their largest revenue source though, and that retail / business customers make up the majority of their customers. I wouldn't doubt that the government starlink contracts have much better margins though and can skew profitability into uncertainty without them.