this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
141 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

80330 readers
4009 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
141
Unredacted files reveal Anthropic’s ‘secret plan’ to ‘destructively scan all the books in the world' (www.thebookseller.com)
submitted 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In the filings, Anthropic states, as reported by the Washington Post: “Project Panama is our effort to destructively scan all the books in the world. We don’t want it to be known that we are working on this.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't say words were sacred, but destroying millions of books is a colossal waste of resources. This is not totally fine.

[–] astro@leminal.space 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The resources were wasted by the publishers when they transformed the resources into a finished product with very limited utility and reusability. Books on shelves are not resources.

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The resources were wasted by everyone involved. Stop defending this bullshit.

[–] astro@leminal.space 2 points 1 hour ago

No, I won't stop calling things like I see them, and I am unlikely to see them differently unless presented with an actual argument (premise, claim, evidence, impact) that amounts to more than "no u"