this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
335 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

80503 readers
4060 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Not on desktop use. Which is a market segment that is under served.

Would love to replace my 4x 1440p monitor setup with a 50 inch 8k TV setup.

[–] qupada@fedia.io 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Presuming you mean 4x 2560x1440 there, you can have close enough to that pixel count today; one of the things Dell released at CES this year was a 52" 6144x2560 display (U5226KW).

Since it's intended to be a monitor, you get a USB hub, DisplayPort, Thunderbolt, and other things you wouldn't get on a TV, too.

I've been looking at it longingly, but I can't quite justify that pricetag right now.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Its a step in the right direction.

Not quite the aspect ratio I am looking for and the price is too eye watering.

What I want is an 8k 16:9 or 16:10 display for around double the price of a 4k display at the same price as a high end 4k TV (OLED or mini led)

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

8k gaming? In this economy? That's a niche that less than 0.1% of people can even afford

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Gaming would be done at 4k. It's 8k for productivity.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago

I highly doubt they were talking about gaming.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That would be nice for CAD work, but it would have to be an actual PC monitor, not a TV. 42 inch would be just about right for my desk. The only ones I've seen are 32 inch, which is too small to replace four monitors.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

I've got a 43" 4k Gigabyte Aorus display. 144hz+freesync, dual hdmi+usb-c+DP with a hub and all that. It's IPS, they had an OLED but it was 48" and more money than I could justify at the time.

Definitely recommend, but 8k would be so much better. I know this article is primarily "no 8k TVs" but the panels are used across many segments and I fear they will no longer have manufacturering setup for 8k for desktop use either at this rate.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think 50 inch is about the upper end for what can fit on a desk, but a 42 inch is the upper limit for most. I used to have a 42inch 4k monitor ($400), but it broke and got discontinued. It was basically a 42inch IPS TV display.

I still miss that display.