This leadership race is about far more than choosing the next leader of the NDP. After the so-called Red Wave allowed the Liberals to cling to power, the party has been effectively dead in the water. The race has become a conduit for members to express their desire to rebuild the party—to renew and transform it.

And yet, the decision to bar Mugyenyi suggests the opposite: this is not a party genuinely interested in renewal. By preventing a candidate from even clearing the vetting stage, the NDP leadership constricts who is allowed to participate, which ideas may be debated, and which political tendencies are kept safely out of the spotlight.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

candidacy are engaging in Rwandan genocide denialism,

and

NDP national president Lucy Watson said in a statement that candidates in the leadership race need to uphold values of integrity, honesty and respect for human rights.

Seems like NDP is doing a good job then.

Should the candidates try for UCP instead? Their values seem to be aligned with some branches of that party.

also, is @op a bot? +1,4k posts, no engagement.

edit: found this post that paints a different picture of her husband https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/the-ndp-needs-more-not-less-nuttiness/article_e1364ffd-0245-4060-8d5a-fe582030741f.html take it with a grain of salt because it is an opinion piece.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah I have no idea, the first article just had zero rebuttal to the couple not having independent, arm's length candidacy runs.