this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
223 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

80670 readers
3540 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 163 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

The word 'terrorist' has lost all meaning at this point.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 17 minutes ago

It never had meaning. To instill deep fear. Doing violent acts with the purpose of achieving a political end.

It's always been super broad and just waiting for a domestic party to adopt the tactics of Israel's occupied territories here in the US, that's where this was always heading.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 121 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I had to double-check what Deflock was for:

DeFlock's mission is simple: to shine a light on the widespread use of ALPR technology, raise awareness about the threats it poses to personal privacy and civil liberties, and empower the public to take action.

This app makes it easy to view and report AI powered surveillance cameras, automatic license plate readers (ALPRs), and other surveillance infrastructure near you.

Sharing information about where cameras are located is terrorism now?

🙄

[–] ozoned@piefed.social 53 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Careful! I think logic and questions are the new terrorist things to do! Oooo scarey!

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 22 points 2 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 23 minutes ago

Believe it or not, jail

[–] db2@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Better ask chatgpt what to do about that.

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world -5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

You jest but this is my default behavior now

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 minutes ago

"Things you couldn't get me to publicly admit for $500, Alex"

[–] db2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 15 minutes ago

What is this pic from exactly?

[–] 5oap10116@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Don't turn off your telescreen

[–] Damage@feddit.it 6 points 2 hours ago

Shit from the title I thought they were going around smashing the cameras and that it was an exaggeration, but I was clearly wrong on the scale

It lost all meaning the second Bush declared the "War on Terror".

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 31 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is just a play out of the rules for radicals playbook: accuse others of what you are doing.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 3 hours ago
[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

In the UK the term is defined by the government as anyone who is deemed by the government a threat to the government or the people or someone's property or the predominant local religion. But recently it's been exclusively used for the first one. In this country state law is valued higher than corporate, moral, ethical and religious laws, so YMMV

"
Terrorism: interpretation. (Terrorism Act 2000)

(1)In this Act “terrorism” means the use or threat of action where— (a)the action falls within subsection (2), (b)the use or threat is designed to influence the government [or an international governmental organisation] or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and (c)the use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious [, racial] or ideological cause.

(2)Action falls within this subsection if it— (a)involves serious violence against a person, (b)involves serious damage to property, (c)endangers a person’s life, other than that of the person committing the action, (d)creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public, or (e)is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system.

(3)The use or threat of action falling within subsection (2) which involves the use of firearms or explosives is terrorism whether or not subsection (1)(b) is satisfied.

(4)In this section— (a)“action” includes action outside the United Kingdom, (b)a reference to any person or to property is a reference to any person, or to property, wherever situated, (c)a reference to the public includes a reference to the public of a country other than the United Kingdom, and (d)“the government” means the government of the United Kingdom, of a Part of the United Kingdom or of a country other than the United Kingdom.

(5)In this Act a reference to action taken for the purposes of terrorism includes a reference to action taken for the benefit of a proscribed organisation.
"

Link

[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 11 minutes ago

It's so broad, they can accuse anyone of it, and that's the point. Both parties have long supported these over broad laws too, because they are not on our side, they want the ability to bring the power of the state on the heads of any groups that might not be breaking the law in a way any reasonable person would condemn but still scare those aritstocrats.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

In the UK it means the cop wants your ID and is willing to pretend your camera is a gun to get it.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 3 points 49 minutes ago

The UK isn't the US (at least in this context) almost nobody has guns.

In very limited situations the police can, but it's not the norm.

Don't get me wrong, ACAB, they just don't generally use guns a as a pretext, perhaps a knife, or perhaps there is more than an arbitrary number of people grouped together so they can claim an 'illegal' protest.