this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
997 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

80990 readers
4896 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Discord announced on Monday that it’s rolling out age verification on its platform globally starting next month, when it will automatically set all users’ accounts to a “teen-appropriate” experience unless they demonstrate that they’re adults.

Users who aren’t verified as adults will not be able to access age-restricted servers and channels, won’t be able to speak in Discord’s livestream-like “stage” channels, and will see content filters for any content Discord detects as graphic or sensitive. They will also get warning prompts for friend requests from potentially unfamiliar users, and DMs from unfamiliar users will be automatically filtered into a separate inbox.

Direct messages and servers that are not age-restricted will continue to function normally, but users won’t be able to send messages or view content in an age-restricted server until they complete the age check process, even if it’s a server they were part of before age verification rolled out. Savannah Badalich, Discord’s global head of product policy, said in an interview with The Verge that those servers will be “obfuscated” with a black screen until the user verifies they’re an adult. Users also won’t be able to join any new age-restricted servers without verifying their age.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Time for me to review Revolt Chat again to see what has updated.

Wow, apparently they change their name entirely. I am way behind

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 15 hours ago

It's dead. The development has been as fraught as Tox and it has no feature parity. Not sure it's worth forking.

Right now your best options are jitsi for video or good old mumble for voice and simplex or matrix for text chat.

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's Stoat now! https://stoat.chat/

I recently joined! It's very close to Discord.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

No VOIP? That's the only reason I ever use discord, when my friends force me to so I can talk while we play games. Guess teamspeak is still king

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 16 hours ago

There's rocketchat, too, which bills itself more corporately

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago

No video call or screen share either from what I can tell, which is uhhh pretty major to day the least. That said, it's not like I need only use one platform at a time. I'll probably get on that and start using it and hope that they add those things in the future. But yeah, I'm not sure if I would call it close to Discord right now.

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They have voice chat channels in Stoat, or are you wanting p2p calls?

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No just voice channels, I'm glad they have them but it was completely missing from their marketing on the website. Just says "text channels done right" and there isn't a single line about voice support

Edit, found a reddit post from about a month ago which is copied below. So it looks like it barely supports voice so far.

"Apparently The voice chat feature has been brought back in stoat

It only works in the desktop version though. Mobile devices you're going to have to wait a bit longer though.

Otherwise the quality of it is really really good but you will experience a massive delay in your voice being sent through the voice medium. It's about 800 millisecond delay even with the fastest speeds. But at least it's something. "

GitHub issue on the topic

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, I could see that being confusing.

I will say compared to discord the voice channels sound rough and I'm not sure I remember that many options to customize the experience

[–] neshura@bookwyr.me 4 points 1 day ago

I'll take rough around the edges over potential ID theft tbh

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

If you don't care about audio on screenshare you could use matrix, that's what I do.

[–] hurn@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone else not receiving the verification email? Doesn't seem to work for me.

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

I think it took a long time for me the first time. They seem way smaller than Discord, so I imagine they don't have the fastest infrastructure. Also, I signed up with a non-gmail account and their verification email did make it through eventually.

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Wow! I had checked these guys out a long while ago. It seems they've gotten a fresh coat of paint. I should revisit it. Maybe convince my friends to switch...

[–] rainbowbunny@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

Reposting my reply from another thread, just to keep people informed:

Keep in mind everyone that Stoat still doesn't currently protect it's users information and is centralized. It doesn't use encryption but it is very seamless. You can host your own Stoat instance but it doesn't communicate with the main one. The devs have said they plan to add more security features in the future yet still don't make it a priority. The host of Stoat should be able to see everyone's messages, including in DM's, due to the lack of E2E encryption. Once they add more security features I imagine they will be much more popular in general.