this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
441 points (98.0% liked)

People Twitter

9516 readers
1363 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 48 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I’m just kind of stunned by the “summarize this email” button. It’s 3 sentences!

[–] f314@lemmy.world 27 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah.. I saw this on a technical blog post for developers the other day and almost bust a blood vessel

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Can they add a button "understand this for me"? I don't feel like a summary is reducing my effort enough. /s

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 41 points 13 hours ago

"Read with my fucking eyes"

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 10 points 13 hours ago
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Do people regularly get emails long enough to justify a summary button? I think I've seen those maybe once out every thousand emails I get.

Or is it summarizing the whole thread?

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 3 points 5 hours ago

Not regularly, but sometimes I'll come back to work after a few days off, and find one of those threads of 200 emails pinging around chaotically.

In those cases, I'm happy to let Copilot try and figure out what the hell was going on. Worst case it gives me a dogshit summary and I'm no worse off.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

I do, but that's because I subscribe to hobby newsletters that tend to run long. I wouldn't use a summary button because I want every bit of that content.