this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
67 points (71.9% liked)

Technology

81128 readers
3714 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When people ask me what artificial intelligence is going to do to jobs, they’re usually hoping for a clean answer: catastrophe or overhype, mass unemployment or business as usual. What I found after months of reporting is that the truth is harder to pin down—and that our difficulty predicting it may be the most important part of

https://web.archive.org/web/20260210152051/www.theatlantic.com/magazine/2026/03/ai-economy-labor-market-transformation/685731/

In 1869, a group of Massachusetts reformers persuaded the state to try a simple idea: counting.

The Second Industrial Revolution was belching its way through New England, teaching mill and factory owners a lesson most M.B.A. students now learn in their first semester: that efficiency gains tend to come from somewhere, and that somewhere is usually somebody else. The new machines weren’t just spinning cotton or shaping steel. They were operating at speeds that the human body—an elegant piece of engineering designed over millions of years for entirely different purposes—simply wasn’t built to match. The owners knew this, just as they knew that there’s a limit to how much misery people are willing to tolerate before they start setting fire to things.

Still, the machines pressed on.

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

There are gobs of money to be made selling enterprise software, but dulling the impact of AI is also a useful feint. This is a technology that can digest a hundred reports before you’ve finished your coffee, draft and analyze documents faster than teams of paralegals, compose music indistinguishable from the genius of a pop star or a Juilliard grad, code—really code, not just copy-paste from Stack Overflow—with the precision of a top engineer. Tasks that once required skill, judgment, and years of training are now being executed, relentlessly and indifferently, by software that learns as it goes.

Literally not true.

It can't "analyze" documents. There's no thinking involved with these machines. It outputs the statistically most likely thing that looks like analysis.

And it's not even close as good as the top engineer. If it was there would be no engineers TODAY.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

This is why I get so frustrated when people demand I integrate this stuff into every workflow. It’s not thinking at all. It’s just regurgitating text based on input and hoping for the best.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And let's not forget the asinine claim about music composition. Yeah, this is a bullshit fluff piece to keep attention on AI.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

The only thing I've found "AI music"good for is making unsettling endless droning. It's actually quite good at that.

Perfect for a creepy pasta low effort YouTube bait game.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

Could AI blow up the world tomorrow? Who knows! The future is unpredictable, so it's basically a 50-50, right? /s

[–] dparticiple@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

LodeMike, I'm curious about something. What's the latest set of AI models and tools you've used personally? Have you used Opus 4.5 or 4.6, for instance?

I am not disagreeing with the points you've made, but it's been my experience that the increase in capabilities over the last six months has been so rapid that it's hard to realistically evaluate what the current frontier models are capable of unless you've uused them meaningfully and with some frequency.

I'd welcome your perspective.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not OP but I use these on the regular.

I’d still agree with the OP that there are hard limits to what these can do. I’ve gotten Claude stuck in loops before on removing unrelated code, then adding it back, then removing it again hoping it’ll fix something.

And OP is still correct. At the heart of all of this it’s “given input x guess the probability of response Y”. Even frontier models don’t think. They can output tokens to call tools to try and get more input x but it’s still a best guess.

You can also give them too much context and get “context rot” which makes their output absolutely horrible too. I think cursor had a problem with that where too many Claude skills caused cursor to hallucinate and go nuts.

[–] dparticiple@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

All valid points.

However, the actual capabilities of the AIs might not matter with respect to job displacement, since the people making the hiring decisions are absorbing the marketing hype but not using the tools.

Even if folks are still hired, they might experience second order effects like increased job stress and burnout: https://fortune.com/2026/02/10/ai-future-of-work-white-collar-employees-technology-productivity-burnout-research-uc-berkeley/

I'm rather glad that I'm reaching the end of my career and not trying to break into the market as a junior software engineer.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Opus like the audio codec?

I use the GPT mini or similar models