this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
1083 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81128 readers
4334 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
1083
Why are people disconnecting or destroying their Ring cameras? (www.usatoday.com)
submitted 1 day ago by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
221 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A Super Bowl ad for Ring security cameras boasting how the company can scan neighborhoods for missing dogs has prompted some customers to remove or even destroy their cameras.

Online, videos of people removing or destroying their Ring cameras have gone viral. One video posted by Seattle-based artist Maggie Butler shows her pulling off her porch-facing camera and flipping it the middle finger.

Butler explained that she originally bought the camera to protect against package thefts, but decided the pet-tracking system raised too many concerns about government access to data.

"They aren't just tracking lost dogs, they're tracking you and your neighbors," Butler said in the video that has more than 3.2 million views.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Your prior comment was for newcomers?

"How is it encrypted, with what algorithm? was the alg implemented securely? who has the decryption keys? how were the keys generated? were they generated from a good enough entropy source? "

This was obviously written for people with quite a bit of knowledge. Most newcomers would have absolutely no idea what any of it means.

[โ€“] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

Your prior comment was for newcomers?

no, it was for everyone.

This was obviously written for people with quite a bit of knowledge. Most newcomers would have absolutely no idea what any of it means.

the point was not to explain how encryption works, but to paint a picture about how many details matter a lot, so that the reader can know that just some kind of "encryption" does not mean much