this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
1068 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81128 readers
4361 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Super Bowl ad for Ring security cameras boasting how the company can scan neighborhoods for missing dogs has prompted some customers to remove or even destroy their cameras.

Online, videos of people removing or destroying their Ring cameras have gone viral. One video posted by Seattle-based artist Maggie Butler shows her pulling off her porch-facing camera and flipping it the middle finger.

Butler explained that she originally bought the camera to protect against package thefts, but decided the pet-tracking system raised too many concerns about government access to data.

"They aren't just tracking lost dogs, they're tracking you and your neighbors," Butler said in the video that has more than 3.2 million views.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

just get a Chinese one like tapo so that the Chinese government can spy on you instead

[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Or hear me out,

Buy one that stores its data only on your local network and does not rely on corporate cloud or servers in any way or form.

This counts for all most all consumer home technology.

People should think about a NASS or Home servers like they do about owning a vehicle.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 13 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Build a server….in this economy? With these component prices?

[–] Widukin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I just installed Linux on my old laptop, added a 4Tb SSD and some HDDs connected with a docking bay and voilà, I have a server. Getting into the software side, now that's a bit harder but manageable.

[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 15 hours ago

I recommend proxmox!

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

You can get an old HP microserver on eBay for less than 100 bucks. Still runs fine. I threw debian on it. Great for starting out... I use mine for backups, services and Jellyfin. It gave my beloved 870 a home. :,)

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 5 points 14 hours ago

People should think about a NASS or Home servers like they do about owning a vehicle.

I wholeheartedly agree. Hell, home server/nas should be more common than cars, I don’t drive every day, but my data is used every minute of every day.

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah right. Next you'll be telling people to get off corporate owned social media and use something without an algorithm.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

use something without an algorithm.

Lemmy uses an algorithm.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago

Technically yes, but unlike e.g. Facebook it isn’t specifically calibrated to prioritise engagement over anything like truth or sanity. https://www.predictiveanalyticsworld.com/machinelearningtimes/five-points-for-anger-one-for-a-like-how-facebooks-formula-fostered-rage-and-misinformation/12344/

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 32 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Which is actually better because the chinese have no jurisdiction in the USA.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

President Xi, my people yearn for freedom.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

At the rate this is going, you may be saying this seriously soon

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I mean if we already have a dictator anyway, how about some infrastructure to go with it?

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 2 points 13 hours ago

High speed rail... mmmmm....

[–] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

i have 5 tapo cameras because they're cheap and work well in HA and frigate and they aren't allowed on the internet and only communicate with the app during onboarding and...

okay i'll get rid of them

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

For anyone not liking Tapo, a good alternative is Reolink. They offer about the same features, but use cameras with higher megapixels.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

And can be configured to only communicate within your network.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Longylonglong@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

HA = Home Assistent, to manage your smart home Frigate = Self Hosted Webcam Server

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

How do you manage remote viewing without internet?

[–] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

2 methods

home assistant (installed on mini pc thru proxmox) via the tapo: camera controls integration

frigate(installed on a dsm 7.2 synology) via go2rtc (mini pc)

also i've set my routers firewall settings so all the wifi cameras can only see eachother (and the mini pc)

edit: oh and tailscale

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

A file server by Synology will have built-in software for this, or you can get a free one by not using a Synology server

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Seance or crystal ball, mainly