this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
120 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

81128 readers
4244 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
120
Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash (www.theverge.com)
submitted 8 hours ago by TheMachineStops@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ItWasTheDNS@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So a partnership with a new third party that also happens to be partnered with Flock?

[โ€“] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

Probably. Ring is pretty plain in saying that they cancelled it because it took "more time and resources than anticipated. " Not because it was the wrong idea. And yeah, it's a carefully coded message that they want consumers to read as "We heard you, we listened, and we won't do shitty things like that again." But in reality, it says the opposite. It says they stopped because it costs too much, but they remain committed to the idea. No doubt some of the additional resources were dealing with the flap around the Superbowl ad and the public douchebaggery of the Flock CEO.