this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
444 points (97.4% liked)

Canada

11645 readers
774 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7671573

Sweden knew Canada's Marc Kennedy was a notorious cheater.

So they set up a camera at the 'hog line' to record it.

And caught him doing it at the Olympics.

tweto

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Whimsical418@aussie.zone 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If anyone's interested in the world curling statement, here. Basically, umpire decisions in the moment are final and cannot be changed from video evidence, the thrower may retouch the stone as many times as they want before the line, BUT they must release the stone from the handle. So a little bit dubious? But they can't change it even with video evidence.

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It does say touching the granite part of the stone is forbidden

[–] dgmib@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think I read that the rules are a bit vague saying something like “release the handle”. And don’t clarify if that explicitly meant the handle is the last /only thing you can touch.

The rules are clear that they can’t touch the stone after it starts to cross the hog line. Which I’ve seen a video of him still touching the granite when the stone has clearly started to cross the line and that’s unambiguously against the rules, regardless of if the touch influenced the stone’s movement.

Edit: I just read the link on the comment above yours. They quote the exact rule in question, and clarify that their official interpretation is that it means touching the granite is against the rules.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I lose respect for any organization that isn't willing to consider evidence other than what officials decide in the moment. It's basically just saying, "we don't really want to do a good job at part of our point for existing" plus a dash of ego being upset at being challenged. It's like zero tolerance policies at schools punishing victims as much as or more than bullies, just pure arrogant laziness disguised as "just following the rule we made up (so that we wouldn't have to think very hard about when we are wrong)".