this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
58 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

81387 readers
5112 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In Abilene, about 200 miles west of Dallas, Natura Resources is building the nation’s first advanced liquid-fuel research reactor in nearly 40 years. The project is housed at Abilene Christian University, where a $25 million research facility was completed in September 2023.

Natura has raised $120 million in private funding and received another $120 million from the Legislature.

Natura’s technology uses molten salt as both fuel and coolant — a design last tested at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the 1960s. The company is first building a 1-megawatt research reactor in Abilene, intended to demonstrate to regulators and investors that the technology works and is safe.

...

Aalo Atomics is taking a different approach. The startup, founded by Canadian-born engineer Matt Loszak and based in Austin, is designing a sodium-cooled fast reactor, a technology that uses solid fuel, like conventional nuclear plants, built specifically for factory mass production.

Each unit would produce 10 megawatts, enough to power roughly 6,000 to 7,000 homes in Texas, and the reactors will be sized to fit on a standard truck. Aalo’s commercial model would consist of five of these units, totaling 50 megawatts.

Loszak said the company plans to activate its first 10 megawatt test reactor within about five months, after completing prototype testing at the end of December, as part of its effort to move toward commercial deployment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -2 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

And who will handle the waste product? And who will pay for handling the waste product?

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 26 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's such a small, manageable concern compared to the damage that is done by fossil fuels.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It is, unless it's distributed in a plume because Texas environmental regulators suck.

[–] Kayday@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 6 hours ago

Haha that’s a good joke.

[–] HumbleExaggeration@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And they have enough people to maintain and inspect the hundreds of thousands of reactors that are going to be built, if those small reactors work?

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

not hundreds of thousands. they are too expensive to be that common.

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Natura's research reactor is designed to first prove the LFMSR concept at megawatt scale, then be converted to prove that MSR reactors can reprocess existing nuclear waste as a percentage of its fuel. Which means we could take all of the current stockpile of nuclear waste and re-burn it to the point that it's 90% consumed (instead of 5% consumed today) and leave a waste product that decays to safe levels extremely quickly (tens of years).

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

I’ll believe it when I see it. This is the state that fracked everything and then spread its radioactive, pfas-infested fracking waste all over the land. Now they’re building elementary schools on top of it.

[–] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 hours ago

Given the track record of a lot of projects, they'll store it on site because actually dealing with it costs money, until it leaks and then they'll disappear and a bunch of people get horrible diseases and the federal government will spend everyone's tax dollars to clean it up.