this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
265 points (99.6% liked)

politics

25266 readers
2170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Beef prices surged to an all-time high in July as the market grappled with consistently strong demand and long-term issues in domestic production.

According to the latest consumer price index, which the Bureau of Labor Statistics published on Tuesday, the beef and veal index rose by 2.5% in July, compared to 0.2% for the broader food category. This capped an 11.3% increase over the past 12 months.

Meanwhile, the price of ground beef and uncooked beef steaks has risen by 11.5% and 12.4%, respectively, both now at record levels.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (6 children)

Good. It's prolly the most polluting food we make (at least as far as meats go)

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 6 hours ago

Don't compare it to other meats. Compare it to corn, wheat, spinach, etc.

Its magnitudes worse than normal food.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 45 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

This is not the cure. As the article says:

High prices are the cure for high prices because they are the signal for ranchers to try to expand their herds.

This will lead ranchers to ~~expansion~~ expand their herds.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Not true. Lots of chicken farmers decided to switch their infrastructure to growing mushrooms in the past decade.

[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Because of disease and difficulty of making a profit.

Beef does not have those issues.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Beef definitely has those problems. CAFOs are rancid places full of disease. Slaughter houses too.

[–] FragrantGarden@lemmy.today 10 points 10 hours ago

Correct, and greater consolidation. This has already been a long trough in the cyclical cycle. A ton of older ranchers are looking at the prices and just selling with no intent to calve another herd. Not a ton of young people lined up behind them. But economics will dictate that the herd is built back up in another 2-3 years as always.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 22 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, IF the higher prices caused consumers to eat less beef, but that's not necessarily going to happen.

[–] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Well if it makes you feel better the high prices have made me quit eating beef. I've switched it out for beans and sausage. I'm not vegan but I am cheap.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sausage has the extra benefit that it's already seasoned, so you don't have to add extra.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I’m amazed the meat replacement companies didn’t start with sausage. The extra flavor would help mask any differences in the flavor of the “meat”

[–] grindemup@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Beyond Need has indeed had sausages for quite awhile now.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 hours ago

Sample size of 1, but I've basically stopped buying beef since many years back because of how much more expensive it was as compared to chicken or vegetarian options. Granted, I like the climate benefits as well, but I wound down my beef purchasing before that was a more primary concern of mine.

This is in Sweden where beef prices as compared to alternatives have been high for a long time.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

all of agriculture is about 1/5 of our ghge, and we need to eat. let's shut down the war machines before we start telling poor people they need to change their lifestyles

[–] TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

“We need to eat” rhymes poorly with climate wrecking animal farming, which not only speeds up harvest devastating warming and flooding – it also consumes a lot of food and uses enormous amounts of farmable land.

Poor people are not in any way immune to the apocalypse and will have to change their lifestyles one way or the other.

You’re championing dying with a belly full of cheeseburgers over tofu and a shot at long term survival. It’s not progressive.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

I'm championing shitting down the war machines. don't put words in my mouth

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not to be a dick, but progressive or not doesn't matter, what matters us effective.

We need two solutions. Short and long term

Short term survival and the long term bounty.

[–] TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Nothing dickish about making your point, that’s what we’re here for.

I agree that we need effective measures, in terms of combatting climate change there are few things that are more efficient than eliminating animal agriculture. For there to even be a long term, at all, drastic measures are needed in the short term.

But at this point, it feels like LARPing to bother thinking about, climate change. Not a lot of room for the issue in the flooded zone.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

there are few things that are more efficient than eliminating animal agriculture

I doubt it

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. We do have a mountain sized orange pimple to deal with first. Or at least living through the orwelian nightmare he heralds

[–] TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

Yep, there is that, no way around it

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Just want to note, just because a person gives up beef doesn't mean you have to have tofu. I really dislike tofu. Even the years I kept vegan I never had it except to try it a few times.

There are tons of other options in the bean world for protein replacement. Otherwise love your point.

[–] TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Hehe yeah, I think tofu is sooo good though! :P

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I ate tofu before I was vegan, but man I've upped my tofu game since then. Pan fry it and finish with sesame oil and soy sauce, and its a game changer.

I know it's a bit of a meme to say "you just haven't had the right one yet", but I think a lot of people get the idea of mushy plain tofu and are rightly turned off. It's so frickin good when you make it right.

Here's the recipe I use.

[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Agreed. But the west shouldn't do that until fascists in Russia and China are lead as far away from power as possible and the genocides they perpetrate stopped.

And those can be easily be financed with rich people's money, there's a lot of that to go around.

And regardless, if the west accumulates enough weapons, the associated deterrence will be dissuasive enough anyway.

Edit : Also you're disregarding the fact that meat is the worst, and beef is the worst meat in terms of greenhouse gas emissions :

Wikipedia graph

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

how is that calculated?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

fascists in Russia and China

all fascists should be removed from power

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There is an obvious solution to needing this amount of food worldwide though.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Genocide is not a good solution to high food prices.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Indeed. I feel that way about most articles/posts about "$15 doLLaR BIg MaC!!1" You're telling me I'm supposed to be mad that people have to pay more money for less disgusting fast food? No, fuck that. Triple the prices on everything across the board and cut portions down to a third. Maybe then those people will get the message to cook something lean, fresh and healthy at home. /rant

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago

I was speaking to my husbands grandmother (92) recently when the discussion of cooking came up. She mentioned when she was young, they never had salads, they weren't really a thing. She mentioned most vegetables came in a can, and now salads were expected at meals.

This women eats very little, and very healthy. I bet one reason why she's still sharp at 92. But it made me think of the culture around food we have in the sates over the last 50-60 years.

We now have full generations of folks not taught how to cook from scratch. I was lucky, growing up on a small farm, my guardian did teach me the basics, igniting a love for cooking. That plus the early 2000's Food Network shows, I was able to self learn and now I feel invincible in the kitchen. Though I will say I still fuck up from time to time. I made zucchini bread, and definitely didn't add enough flour, and my bread is very hit or miss. Anyways,

You can't teach your children what you don't know youself. So many folks out there don't know what to do with raw ingredients. I grow oregano, and it's just all over the yard this year. I tried giving some to my (60-ish) neighbor, and she said, "I dont know what to do with that".

It's a fucking herb lady, put it in your stew.

The commercialization of foods from the center isles really had damaged our, collective food knowledge. There are exceptions of folks, similar to me, but a vast number have no clue, nor is it a point in our (American) culture to make sure young folks know how to feed themselves with little ingredients. This road began its paving in the 50/60s with convenience cooking, and the loss of home gardens.

And to add, as a well versed home cook, you absolutely can make super unhealthy foods from scratch as well. Learning to cook is healthier than fast food, but you can absolutely throw down some calorie dense foods in your own kitchen too. It's not a cure all for health.