this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
567 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

81621 readers
4601 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The County of Los Angeles filed suit today against social media gaming platform Roblox alleging that the platform failed to protect children from predatory behavior. The lawsuit alleges that while Roblox markets itself as a safe digital space for creativity, it is in reality an unsafe online environment that has become a breeding ground for predators.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Set parental controls

This is what they are suing about.

Don't sign away the rights of other adults

What rights do you think are being "signed away" in this lawsuit about Roblox not providing functional parental controls and moderation?

I think there is a fundamental misunderstanding of what is actually happening here.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Probably talking about invasive shit like what discord just did.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 18 hours ago

Which they are already doing in the shittiest way possible, and is only a small part of the problem the lawsuit notes.

Which is why I've been asking, they can't answer because they dont know what they are talking about, they are concerned about a single (almost tangential) element of the problem - which Roblox already is doing, and only because they keep getting sued for catering to predators.

[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Because those parents are pushing for age verification stuff, that has already been confirmed by hackers to be sent straight to the DOJ and ICE to make a database and link people's internet profiles to their real names. With possibly the intention to either arrest people for criticizing ICE, or deporting people they DEEM to be illegals.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

...And I can't read further because I don't have an X account. And the source is "hackers".

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Thats not the only means of age verification.

Do you know how they are doing verification currently? Because I bet you won't like it.

Mandatory facial verification, processed by AI. This was the response made by Roblox to them being sued over having nonfunctional controls for parents, and doing nothing about the predators on their platform.

So I'll ask again - what rights do you think are being taken away here?

Edit: Just going to add this bit here.

Tech journalist and former CNET senior writer Casey Newton asked what Baszucki (CEO) thinks of the "problem of predators" on the platform

The response:

We think of it not necessarily just as a problem, but an opportunity as well.

This is not an "age verification" thing. This is a platform catering to predators.

[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Did you not read the Twitter thread? The facial verification is done by OpenAI and shared with Palantir, the DOJ, and ICE. Yes, including Roblox's. What makes you think the DOJ would NOT try to build a profile on someone going through age verification who's brown enough to be considered an "illegal" and possibly detain or deport them if they criticize ICE?

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Did you not read the part where I pointed out that it was Roblox who implemented that by choice?

That this is how Roblox decided to try and avoid lawsuits for catering to predators?

That these measures, as noted in the suit, do absolutely nothing and are easily defeated?

That the issue goes far beyond their own decision to implement this form of age verification?

I have the same question and you still have not answered, youre answering a question that I didnt ask that is unrelated.

What rights are being signed away by this lawsuit?

Edit: about/avoid autocorrect shenanigans.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Calling Roblox’s actions voluntary is misleading to the point of maliciousness.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 4 points 19 hours ago

They did it to avoid suits, which is what I said.

Suggesting its anything other than avoiding consequences (to their profits) is misleading to the point of maliciousness.