this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
581 points (97.7% liked)

politics

31134 readers
3210 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It doesn’t get more pathetic than this.

Oh I disagree that the Democrats won't be more pathetic than this.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Being a democrat is like having commanding officers most of which cannot grasp which end of a gun the bullets come from.

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not stupidity or cowardice, the dems who voted to reopen are doing this on purpose. Their interests dont align with the well being of the vast majority of Americans.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Ok...after today, It's possible I may need to retract that a little.

[–] webp@mander.xyz 9 points 10 months ago

Unfit for office.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago

"Standing Up to Trump Didn't Work...so I took the money and decided to get out of politics" FTFY

[–] r4venw@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

Nothing says "journalism" like repeating the content of a televised interview and getting the name of Maine's governor wrong.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

And giving him what he wants will. Goodbye and good riddance you braindead meatbags

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (15 children)

I've heard this argument that the deal they got wasn't going to get any better in a few places. What are the counter arguments to that?
Because it was working, trumps numbers are down a bit, the election losses. But those didn't phase the Republicans at all seemingly. I personally think they still should have held out, but I don't have any logic for my stance. Is there any?

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Their corporate overlords (amazon mostly I bet) were going to start losing money from the holiday air shipping and travel closures so they called up Schumer and told him to rap it up.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Schumer voted no. I'm looking for real reasons that won't get me laughed out of the room for being uninformed.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Schumer was in on it and voted no because he wanted the plausible deniability because he knows he's in hot water for all his previous collaborationist deals. The yes voters are loyal sacrificial patsies who (all but one I think) aren't up for reelection. It's backfired on him because one of the patsies chickened out while being grilled on camera and blabbed on him. That's the consensus.

As to why now, yeah I'm pretty sure the air traffic closures were going to inconvenience their corporate donors.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Caving to Trump, though, works just great -- for Trump and GOP, Certainly not for amyone else, such as theUS public,

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

He's 81 and in for reelection in 2030?
(Last year he won over two other candidates like 15 years younger than him, still over retirement age.)

Who are his sponsors/who does he work for?
Was it about air travel?

If Olympic games/basketball/hockey/etc would be chosen by vote USA teams would all be over 80 probably.

In my mind it was 100% either pressure from the air travel lobby, or because they thought Trump might actually get the votes to nuke the filibuster.

[–] Jolly_Platypus@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

He has to go. POS.

[–] blueworld@piefed.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck is with this article? All over the place. Horrible read. Two relevant paragraphs.

Eight Senate Democrats caved to Donald Trump and voted to approve a budget deal with Republicans to end the government shutdown, angering their colleagues in Congress as well as their own party’s base.

These eight senators, including independent Angus King who caucuses with the party, are all either retiring or up for reelection years from now. They likely feel that they won’t have to pay an electoral cost for failing to stand up for Democrats’ goal of extending health care subsidies, instead settling for a future vote on the matter.

The full list of these Democrats is below:

Senator Richard Durbin (Illinois, retiring) Senator Angus King (Maine, term ends in 2030) Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada, term ends in 2028) Senator Jacky Rosen (Nevada, term ends in 2030) Senator Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire, term ends in 2028) Senator Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire, retiring) Senator John Fetterman (Pennsylvania, 2028) Senator Tim Kaine (Virginia, 2030)

[–] AniZaeger@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

As a resident of Nevada, I sure wish we could recall federal offices the same way we could recall state ones right about now...

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

These traitors need to be removed from office.

Fucking christ, I hate Neoliberals

[–] JaymesRS@piefed.world 4 points 10 months ago

While King does caucus with Democrats, he isn’t an explicit member of the party anymore and hasn’t been since the 90’s

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›