this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
165 points (94.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35926 readers
2456 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] turdas@suppo.fi 85 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Jesus wouldn't quote the Bible. It was written hundreds of years after his death.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Merely providing Bible quotes is probably the better decision though.

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. Basically just acting as a pretty good search engine to find relevant quotes.

[–] notreallyhere@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

yeah but he's quoting from heaven

didn't they teach you anything in science class?

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The cloud. Didn't they teach you anything in IT class?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Also wasn't white

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 2 weeks ago

He might quote himself, which was then put in the Bible, tho.

[–] BenVimes@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Let's be correct here: the Christian Bible was canonized centuries after Jesus's death. That's not the same thing as being written.

I still appreciate the point you're making, though.

[–] turdas@suppo.fi 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The New Testament was written after his death too, some parts of it earlier than others. I think it's also a pretty safe bet that there was a lot of editorializing over the centuries, since AFAIK the earliest surviving copies of anything are from the 2nd or 3rd centuries CE.

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's probably less editorializing than you'd think. At least less that was successful in being hidden. There are verses that we know we're added in later that seem like they fit in perfectly. Example: "for yours is the kingdom, the power, and the glory, now and forever" at the end of the Lord's prayer. That verse feels right at home there, but based on early copies and differences between copies as Christianity spread, we know that wasn't original.

[–] turdas@suppo.fi 2 points 2 weeks ago

Well, the gospels themselves are an example of editorializing. None of the gospels are written by the disciples themselves, most if not all of them were written after all the apostles would have been dead, and it is widely agreed that two of them (Matthew and Luke) are basically fanfiction spin-offs of Mark and a second, long lost source.

To clarify, I think by the time the stories were canonized, the narrative was likely more or less established. But in the 2-3 centuries before that I expect it to have been quite varied. We have no real way of knowing either way because there are very few surviving scraps of manuscripts from that early on.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

'this fan fiction is now mainstream'.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Some parts of the bible are shown to have been written about 400 years later

[–] BenVimes@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I don't see where I said otherwise.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

He would and did quote the old testament. The prophets books were written at least a few hundred years before he lived, and those were the latest of the old testament to be written.

The new testament was written about 100 years after he lived, and canonized a few hundred years later.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

The old testament did exist, and Jesus misquoted and misunderstood the fuck out of it.

Matthew 22:41-45

Jesus asks the pharisees how the messiah can be the son of David when David calls the holy spirit "lord," referring to psalm 110 whish starts "the lord said to my lord." It's a ridiculous claim to start with, but it's not even the correct understanding. The narrator is not David, they're recounting what happened to David. The lord (God) said to my lord (king David). At no time does David even speak in psalm 110.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

And not in English

[–] Ethalis@jlai.lu 43 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

So how is this not blasphemy? Not that I care, mind you, but they're supposed to

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago

"They" are supposed to do and be many things, which they usually do or are the opposite of. But covertly.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The people making this are almost always cynical, amoral, business-as-religion tech bros.

Of course its blasphemy that's why they do it. They love making a buck off gullible believers.

[–] III@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Who are these "they" you speak of? Do you mean the small handful of christians that actually adhere to their own religious texts?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The image looks rather a lot like the "Buddy Christ" from Dogma. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Buddy_christ.jpg

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I see Christian bale

[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

25“Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? 26Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? 27And which of you by being anxious can add a single hour to his span of life?g 28And why are you anxious about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they neither toil nor spin, 29yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 30But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is alive and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will he not much more clothe you, O you of little faith? 31Therefore do not be anxious, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ 32For the Gentiles seek after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. 33But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.

34“Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble.

You'd think a JesusGPT would remember the Gospels better than the letters Paul wrote decades after he died having never met him.

[–] Akido37@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 1 points 2 weeks ago

Damn, you saw this first.

[–] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago

This just makes me want to try to get it to hallucinate a Bible verse that doesn't exist.... but it's not worth giving them the traffic to try.

[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

So umm "make no idols before me" really took a 180⁰ turn in this capitalist hellscape. Its almost like Jesus was hippie commie who wanted peace in the middle east and not generations of war and bloodshed against the native inhabitants of Jerusalem and the west bank

[–] Envy@quokk.au 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would Jesus quote Paul, a pharisee who hijacked Christ's words to turn anarchistic personal salvation back into controllable religion?

[–] Flickerby@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago

I have a neighbor down the street named Jesus I gab with sometimes but he hasn't been out much because the government is trying to human traffick him into torture.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Someone please hack this to only return Torah quotes and only in Aramaic.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That first sentence had me startled.

EDIT: Looks at second text. Is this secretly Winn Adami?

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

She did her homework. Easily the best actor on that show, she was so perfectly hateable.

[–] aggelalex@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

The literal peak of AI psychosis, in your hands

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I see they went with “white Jesus” instead of what he actually looked like.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

Why did they use a picture of Christian Bale?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Afaik these things are not approved of by any churches or religious organizations.

If you ask them if Jesus would suck a dick to save a soul none of them give the correct answer.

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

And thus far, neither have you. Neither have you.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 2 weeks ago

First the pope throws a rave, now this 🤦

[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

MmMmmMmm! hot blonde, whippings and crucifixions!

[–] BoosBeau@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ask him what that hole in his hand do

[–] notreallyhere@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I need this

load more comments
view more: next ›