this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
382 points (98.5% liked)

politics

31112 readers
2261 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

J.D. Vance’s lead in the polls could be collapsing because of his association with Trump, according to an expert

J.D. Vance’s chances of becoming the GOP nominee for president in 2028 have taken a dive, according to a new poll.

The survey looking at potential successors to Donald Trump has seen the vice-president’s lead in a list of theoretical candidates narrow significantly in recent months.

And in the most recent poll in November, the Vance’s margin continued to fall. According to the survey of 439 voters conducted between November 17 and 24, Vance’s lead over Trump Jr had plummeted to just 10 points. The latest results put Vance at 34% and Trump Jr at 24%.

Trump's polling figures have collapsed in recent months, with every major poll giving Trump a negative rating for the first time ever.

Even a Fox News poll suggested that 61% of respondents think that Trump's administration has damaged the economy, with just 3% approving of his economic strategy.

(page 2) 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RufusFirefly@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if there's anybody in the Republican Party that is a viable candidate, much less JD Vance. The Republican's message may be populist but their motivations are pure greed and authoritarianism and a lot of red state voters are finally waking up to that fact.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

He had kirk killed for nothing? oh the shame

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 9 months ago

No shit, pudding-man. You were never even supposed to be VP. You were there to take the blame when he didn't win.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago

Oh great, so we go from methed out old man, to coked out middle aged wannabe redneck.

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Op: Barron Trump

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It’s only because he’s a spineless tool and nobody likes him. God damn the libs for causing this.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Any one with eyes knew this in 2024. He was sinking the ticket Dems insisted in sinking further, but that's just history now.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I bet the orange cancer PEDOnald is soiling his pre-soiled pants at the mere thought of Vance trying to be next Preznit.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago

Awe, c'mon. Put a clown who has no chance of winning on the ticket..

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

439 voters! Wow! Let's jump to conclusions!

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago

I just gotta aks somethin...

Have you all even said thank you?

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I can't even click onto the article. Anyone who puts any stock in polls is living in a fantasy world. The activity is as flawed as the system it is looking to measure. We might as well be asking oracles or soothsayers. If the polls had any credibility we wouldn't be living in the Trump dystopia, several times over.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

All models are wrong. Some models are useful.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›