this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
191 points (98.5% liked)

politics

25557 readers
2407 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] karashta@piefed.social 42 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is performative and will go to the Senate and die or be torn to pieces and made useless.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Yeah, tbh this is for sure getting filibustered.

Imagine tho if it got shoved into budget reconciliation lol, that would be magical.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is great, and hopefully it moves forward, but also whatever loophole they left should be closed up as well in a follow-up bill.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No fucking way Trump signs it if it even makes it to his desk

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 5 days ago

I think it depends. He might think it a weapon he can use against The Democrats, assuming it doesn't target the executive branch at all.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago
  1. this is like the twelfth time they've "banned insider trading by lawmakers," why is it going to be anymore effective this time?

  2. the fact that this has a Republican cosponsor is more than enough reason to scrap the whole thing and start over

[–] MrFappy@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh damn, hopefully pelosi doesn’t see this, she might have a stroke.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh no, then we might have to have a special election to replace 85-year-old, out-of-touch millionaire Nancy Pelosi, and in the meantime the Democrats will be short a seat while already in the minority and refusing/unable to curb all this fascism. What a tragedy.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You think that everybody whose title is a Mr followed by anything means they're related? I have shocking news: every man you've ever met is not necessarily related to one another. Your teachers growing up were not all family.

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

bruv, he was merely making a joke lol

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Given that Jimmy Carter had to give up a peanut farm, why is this allowed in the first place? Any college freshman in a beginner ethics class would flag this as a “conflict of interest “ and yet here we are. Oh gees, I forgot, it’s about greed. Silly me.

And my wife wonders why I despise the wealthy elite…

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Laws are worse than useless without enforcement. Stock traders break laws every single day, it's part of doing business, as are the tiny fines a few of them are charged when they are called out for breaking laws.

This is complete bullshit. They'll continue to trade, just illegally, now, knowing nothing will happen even in the rare situation where the FTC actually does anything.

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The most corrupt stock traders:
https://youtu.be/BsrAZ0gnkPo.

[–] drofenvy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Maybe let them trade stocks, but they have to publicly report all trades before or right when they're made

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Is it "comprehensive" enough to ban them from trading crypto too?