Lawsuit against California should now be immediately thrown out.
this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
238 points (100.0% liked)
politics
26571 readers
1784 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That one they’ll take up so they can rule against California.
If they rule against California, time to literally burn things down.
The time to burn things down has long passed.
I agree.
Let's start with Governor Hot Wheels' mansion. Preferably with him and all his cohorts inside.
As long as one of those cohorts is Ken "Piece of Shit" Paxton, I'm okay with that
The best Americans can do is an organized protest on a weekend that doesn't affect the economy, ensuring that it can be safely ignored.
Exactly this. Excuses excuses “I have to work” or “I have family” or “I have medical debt” and their country is literally a fascist kakistocracy.
I’m not convinced USers are capable of standing up for themselves.
☝️
"California must not be allowed to gerrymander their districts in favor of Democrats that close to the election."
But won't.
To the surprise of absolutely nobody.
Illegitimate judges judge illegitimately.
I'd really only call one of them illegitimate (Goursch), unless you want to get in on other things like Clarence Thomas being a corrupt motherfucker who should be impeached and removed.
Founding fathers really had faith that bad actors would get impeached. Too many wolves in sheep's clothing for that to happen though.
Depressing but not surprising. Their corruption aside, the argument is that it's not race based because it's partisan gerrymandering... which is the official (and fucked up) reason for the maps. Partisan gerrymandering is legal, for some reason.
That said, race and politics are clearly intertwined so a bunch of black and brown folk are about to be disenfranchised. So long as the GOP remains the party of White Christian Nationalism, any partisan moves will continue to be racial ones inherently.
They said that, while the suit in question contained tons of direct evidence that it was, in fact, racially based.
True, that was one unique part about this one was the Texans said the quiet part out loud. Was obvious enough to the lower courts, anyway.
Somehow I feel this headline could be much shorter, more concise. Let's see...
SCOTUS SUCKS DON'S DICK AGAIN
Nice double alliteration.
SCOTUS GOBBLES DON'S SCROTUS.
SCOTUS: If you paid us with more money and showered us with gifts, we would have likely ruled in your favour instead.
s/Supreme/Corrupt/ig
When do poor people get to stop following the rules? I don't wanna pay taxes this year.
It's way past time to get the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact to 270.
honest query: conservatives hate popular vote / ranked choice / anything that cleans up the absurdities of the electoral college. how the fuck do we pass something like that with half the states fighting everything?
So it doesn't take half the states to pass it. It only takes enough states to make up half of the electoral votes. It could actually be done with as few as 12 states if those with the most electoral votes all agreed (though that requires Texas and Florida to join the compact). But even now, there are only 17 states and DC officially joined in the compact, yet that already makes up almost 39% of electoral votes. They will need some red or purple states to join too, to reach the number of course. There's not enough electoral votes in all the solid blue states alone. Purple state Pennsylvania, and red states Kansas and South Carolina all have bills in committee to join. Were they all to pass, they'd have 45% of the electoral college in the compact.
It's to the benefit of hard red states too though. It will make their needs more of a priority for campaigning presidents instead of only Swing States being pandered to. The Swing states are the only ones that have a vested interest in preserving the status quo. And it's not like Trump wouldnt be president now if the compact was triggered now (unfortunately) so it's silly to pretend that it would prevent conservative presidencies.
It doesn't take half the states, just half the states worth of electoral votes - and yeah, getting texas and florida... not likely. it's an awesome idea, but the hurdles are real.
It’s to the benefit of hard red states too though.
they've never really voted to their own benefits if they conflict with the gop's mission. see: everything
2025 is WAY too Close to 2026!
-The Justice appointed AFTER people ALREADY Voted!
No way.
The best and worst thing about Texas is that it's consistent, I'll concede that. Consistently shitty.
No way.