this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
61 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10729 readers
275 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s been hard to keep track of how many legal challenges and active court proceedings the United Conservative government has tried to quash or pre-emptively block in the last six weeks, but let’s try to tally:

  • The notwithstanding clause to thwart separate constitutional challenges by the Canadian Medical Association (1) and 2SLGBTQ+ advocacy groups (2) against Alberta’s ban on some transgender youth health care.
  • Notwithstanding clause against those advocacy groups’ challenge against the school pronouns law (3).
  • Notwithstanding clause against any potential challenges against the ban on transgender women in women’s sports (4).
  • Notwithstanding clause against teachers’ potential challenge to the strike-ending and imposed contract (5).
  • Bill 12’s provision to block public sector pensions from suing over the Alberta wealth management fund’s past trading losses (6). And then the measure in this week’s Bill 14 designed to discontinue the court hearing about the constitutionality of a citizen’s initiative petition for Alberta separation from Canada (7).

One could argue there’s an eighth case the UCP government’s legislation would nullify if passed — one filed by the United Conservative Party itself. That would be the governing party’s lawsuit against two of its former MLAs who had applied with Elections Alberta to rebrand the Alberta Party as the Progressive Conservative Party.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Threeskittiesinatrenchcoat@lemmy.ca 11 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The UCP are desperate to hang onto the name conservative since they've given up on conservative values entirely and fallen to Christian Nationalism instead. But they are absolutely reliant on the portion of Albertans who consider themselves tribal conservatives, people who outsource their decision making to those whom they see as tribal authorities.

[–] leastaction@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago

It's pretty obvious why, but the article doesn't address the question asked in the headline.