Apparently she ran out of people willing to shake her hand.
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
191 points (98.0% liked)
politics
26640 readers
1902 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Nobody asked what you think Nancy
She was very effective at using her inside knowledge to trade on the stock market.
Pelosi was a good politician. That doesn't make her a good person. She fleeced millions from insider stock trading in her position of power.
Good politician in terms of behaving like a politician, maybe. In terms of serving her constituents? Nah.
Good politician is generally taken to mean good at corralling the other politicians into passing your agendas, at least how I usually see it use. Like how people call McConnell a "good" politician . Idk tho
Yeah that's pretty much what I meant. Good at playing the game, not great at representing the people. Like most politicians.
It's not like the Republicans set a high bar. Pelosi barely cleared it.
Pelosi stood on top of a pile of money she insider-traded on to top that bat
You might disagree with her policies but she was one of the absolute best at being speaker and getting votes.
and getting votes
Votes for what? Compromise isn't intrinsically good.
Wow, this century is a long time. Nope, just 25 years. Wait, 25 years? Y2K wasn’t that long ago, was it?
No. It was 26 years ago, because we were handling it in the run-up to 2000, not the following December.
Jan 1, 2000 was almost 26 years ago..
Huh. Here I am sort of agreeing with Nancy Mace.
Republicans believe government cannot and will not work. Elect them and they will show you. 😉
Truly heartbreaking.
Of all her crimes, that outfit might be near the top.
Looks like she's getting ready to enter the fire temple.
That outfit says, "I need mental health help", and also "Notice ME!!!".
Do you comment on male representatives' outfits this way too?
Most of them wear the same damned outfit so not really any way to do that to most. But folks have been making fun of Trump's clothes for forever and if you want to expand it to pissants in politics but aren't elected then Musk exists.
Fetterman wearing a hoodie and shorts.
Yeah I can't get over that either. Every time I see him.
President Piggy wearing a cheap polyester suit and fake silk tie. Not to mention his girdle, lifts and that weird orange face paint. I've met whores with more class than him, and wearing wayyyyy less makeup.
You know you’re making a bad faith point? That’s just not the reality we live in.
I mean if they wore a bright baby blue 70s suit with those classic over extended undershirt lapels, I’d comment, but the most we get in variation is John Fetterman.
How can you comment on content that doesn’t exist, they all wear traditional suits.
I'm making a bad faith point by asking an honest question about whether or not this is a one-time thing or sexism? Mace has a lot of reasons to be criticized, her attire doesn't need to enter the conversation. Criticizing women attire, if done more to them than men, is text book sexism. Your comment even proves my point more. You see a suit and think it's a pass, but i could list lots of male representatives whose suits or styles i disagree with! From fit, shoes, socks, or the knot of their tie! To you these things may not matter but this is the equivalent of fighting over what color dress or type of footwear a woman makes. So why does it not matter when a man wears a shitty tied knot but a pink dress and cowboy boots someone needs to comment on it and someone else needs to 'splain im the one acting in bad faith? lmao. The only difference is that by and large the population is more critical of women attire to discredit their leadership. Think what you will about her but her attire has nothing to do with her ability (or not) to serve the people that elected her.
To answer your question directly, we shouldn't focus on what any of them are wearing. Those things i mentioned about men's suits? They don't matter either.
Funny, I didn’t think it could really get worse than Pelosi until Johnson showed up.
Hastert was a child molester. Boehner and Ryan were nothing to get excited about, either.
And then there is Newt, who bears responsibility for so much that is awful about our political situation these days.
Yeah, you’re right, they’re all horrible.
So you thought Kevin McCarthy was better than Nancy Pelosi?
Hah, no, of course not. There’s been many horrible speakers.
Why? Because she can count? Because she can be stern to her caucus and get them to STFU?
She took impeachment off the table for Bush.
What a weird photo
It’s like they put two balloons in a pink dress and stuck two pvc pipes underneath