this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
538 points (94.0% liked)

Greentext

6971 readers
1072 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org 52 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

I can't believe the TV license is real. I just can't. I guess it helps makes good tv tho

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 29 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Americans fund public TV and radio infrastructure through taxes, Brits just make it opt-out if you meet certain criteria by labeling it as a license.

You tell me which has more "freedom."

[–] lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The one where I don't have to upload my I.D. to watch porn, BABY! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅

[–] lewis6991@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Sometimes I forget how much freedoms we have in Washington State. The only thing is strict gun laws, but it's mostly background checks and limited magazine sizes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 6 points 16 hours ago

well I live in Georgia (US state) who brought it in before the UK did.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 46 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The TV license is definitely real. All the others are fake though (I believe).

https://www.gov.uk/find-licences/tv-licence

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 16 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

A TV Licence costs £174.50

Wtf is this in addition to paying for cable/satellite?

[–] JadedBlueEyes@programming.dev 18 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Nope. You can just plug your TV into the aerial to get BBC + free channels. Netflix and whatever costs extra tho

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 22 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

I’m surprised that according to the website, they actually let you get away without a license if you only use commercial streaming services and don’t watch any BBC content. In Germany, that excuse doesn’t fly. As long as your device has the capacity to receive aerial broadcast, you have to pay, whether you watch it or not is irrelevant.

[–] Knuschberkeks@leminal.space 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

afaik in Germany you even have to pay if you have no device that to receive anything. Every household has ro pay wirth a few exeptions.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure not owning ANY broadcast receiving devices is the only way to get around it, but that’s extremely difficult to accomplish. Keep in mind radio counts as well (though you can be eligible for a reduced rate if you only have radio access and no TV), including the one in your car, your stereo, or your alarm clock. Owning a TV with no antenna hooked up does not count either, since it’s trivial to do so, and you could just be hiding an antenna in your attic or your basement.

Basically, the only way to legally skirt the fee is to live under a bridge or in a forest without any electronic devices besides a flash lamp.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 8 points 19 hours ago

I mean we have free over the air TV here in the states too, just don’t need a loicense for it

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Do people elsewhere in the world pay for “cable” tv? I know we had a version here in Australia but it was so rare, no one really used it.

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 9 points 19 hours ago

It was pretty big over here in the US, and still is with Gen X and older. Nowadays, pretty much the only reasons to get it are if you’re a sports fan or enjoy brainrot 24/7 news networks

[–] lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 19 hours ago

Brexit really was a mistake

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 20 hours ago

The long knife prohibition is real.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 24 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The early idea was to support the state-owned and state-operated channels through taxes. Then the channels got privatized and now the taxes are going straight into the pockets of The Brexit Bunch. I mean why would they voluntarily cut off a money source that people were already paying.

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 30 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

In San Diego they had a toll bridge.. once it was paid for they kept the toll. When asked why they were still charging a toll... They said the toll booths still cost money to run. They had to be sued for the toll to stop

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Having to charge toll because they need money to run the toll booths is the most Kafkaesque thing I have heard in a while.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This is/was a thing in many other European countries too.

In Austria it used to be (not long ago, a few years at most) that only people who owned a TV needed to pay it, not anymore, now every household has to pay it, so it is basically a household tax.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's not a tax tho? At least not in Germany. It's going directly to the state-broadcasting service but unconditionally; the idea being it's harder to influence the content or threaten them with cutting off their funding.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 18 hours ago

This is also the case in Austria according to https://orf.beitrag.at/faq/allgemein so whether to call that a "tax" or not is purely a terminological question. It used to be that this was only required for owning a TV, but this was hard to enforce because there was no automatic legal requirement to let inspectors into one's home and companies started to produce TVs without a TV tuner (i.e. could only stream from the Internet) to get around this.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 29 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty accurate, all my butter knives are unregistered

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 30 points 20 hours ago

Yes, constable. This bloke right here.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Br*t self-censorship LOL

[–] Chev@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago (5 children)
[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 26 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

British colloquial term for constable

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] xkbx@startrek.website 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Your uncle.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 5 points 20 hours ago

Robert Peel, the founder of modern policing and the devisor of policing by consent.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Fake: British cops don't carry guns

Gay: Op is sleeping with dudes

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Fellas, is it gay if you’re male and you sleep by yourself?

[–] ignoble_stigmas@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ReCursing@feddit.uk 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Are you telling me this is exaggerated for comedic effect?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›