this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
569 points (96.9% liked)

politics

26756 readers
2530 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez holds a slight lead over Vice President JD Vance in a hypothetical 2028 presidential matchup, according to a new poll.

The New York Democratic congresswoman, known as AOC, edges the likely Republican nominee 51% to 49%, in The Argument/Verasight survey released on Tuesday. However, the result was within the poll's 2.7 percentage point margin of error, making the two candidates statistically tied. The poll asked voters who they would vote for if the election was between the two of them.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago (64 children)

I'm all for a women president eventually, but perhaps the elections during an attempted fascist take over isn't the time.

Some men will simply not vote for a woman, it's sad, but it's reality. If a woman is on the ballot the democrats will lose again.

The time will come, just not yet with stakes this high. I would love to see AOC as the first female president.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I fear you are right. And with numbers like this, the Democrats have an uphill battle anyway, with all the rigging and ratfucking that the Republicans do, not to mention the EC system itself.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago

someone should take one for the team and form an alternative socialist government of the united states as a micronation. seriously!

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 8 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Some men will simply not vote for a woman, it’s sad, but it’s reality.

Can we all agree that those men are trash? I don't care what else they've got going on, if they refuse to vote for a woman because she's a woman, they deserve to go into the dumpster.

I'm so sick of all these sacks of shit making the world worse

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (61 replies)
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I greatly fear that if AOC were to run, the terminally online left would pull the rug out from under her.

Any time she's ever done any action that went not 100% in favor of the delusional mindset of idiots who think single politicians can usher in perfect communism, the TOL screamed bloody murder and withdrew all support and hype.

The same would happen in Nov 2028

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

AOC didn't support Gaza and is not communist enough!!! I will protest vote Jill Stein or not vote at all.

  • Tankies and oblivious leftists (these people are the reason progressive causes never go anywhere).
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Mamdani had not even started his term and has already being cancel by the TOL.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure the terminally online left you mention make up a significant enough portion of any electorate to impact the race in this way.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People didn't want Kamala because she wasn't democratically elected as the leader of the party in a primary so they let full blown fascism take over instead. They felt it was more important to send the Democrats a message instead of actually keeping some minimal form of democracy and freedom. 🙄

So they'll probably not vote for AOC if she becomes leader of the Democratic party anyway because of some minor excuse, like how she supported Israel's right to exist, or something. And the US will end up with a third Trump mandate.

I hope the US will prove me wrong. My hope in Americans doing the right thing is pretty low.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The election isn't won by getting the most total votes which means getting more than 50%+1 of liberal states isn't worth anything and losing 1% of swing states loses you the whole thing.

Anyone who is statistically tied with couch fucker is not a great bet

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (7 children)

This is off topic but God does she have a pretty smile.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The faces of democratic socialism: AOC, Kat Abughazaleh, Zohran Mamdani

The face of the GOP: [ insert bloated face Vance meme here ]

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

We also got Katie Wilson. Sure she isn't classically gorgeous like those three, but damn does that woman represent Seattle.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca -2 points 23 hours ago

You think you'll have elections again? Lmao

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works -3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

A hell of a lot needs to happen before AOC has a snowballs chance in hell in 2028. Like, Trumps impeachment — to start.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

51?

This is what's wrong with people.

Even if trump had lost the election I was gonna be horrified if he had even gotten 30% of the votes. But this... Again. It doesn't matter if AOC wins if half the country is basically saying, after all this, they want more.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

These numbers mean absolutely fucking nothing. They could have surveyed people if they thought a rotten apple or pile of shit had a chance to win the white house and it would have been 49% to 51%

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago (5 children)

As we’ve seen in every election from 2016 on, election polling is useless now.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›