this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11715 readers
537 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NGram@piefed.ca 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Metro pretending to be a victim here would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

In 2025, Metro had net earnings of just under $1.02 billion, growing by 9.4% over 2024. The thieves' estimated damages is $3000. That is around 0.0003% of their earnings. They make more money than that in 2 minutes.

All this information is sourced from Metro's own financial report: https://corpo.metro.ca/userfiles/file/PDF/Rapport-Annuel/2025/en/annual_report_2025_EN.pdf
I don't understand how they have a 2025 financial report before 2025 has even finished, but it doesn't really matter (and I can't be bothered to figure it out). It is the most recent report.

Statcan estimates the inflation rate between November 2024 and November 2025 to be 2.2%. Metro has more than quadrupled inflation. Unless they are somehow making their money from something other than selling goods to consumers, they are definitely charging too much.

Grégoire also defended the company's philanthropic efforts, saying that in 2025, Metro donated $1.15 million to food banks, and provided millions of dollars worth of food donations to other organizations.

With their own financial report in mind, this is basically the corporate equivalent to virtue signalling. If they actually cared about making things affordable, they'd either have reduced their in-store prices to make their net earnings plateau or donated 100x more to food banks.

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

With 22 B in revenue and 1 B in earnings, that puts their cut of your groceries at ~4.5%. That is a bit higher than I expected.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 10 points 2 months ago

I can’t argue with food theft. Make food affordable.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Looks like Robinhood to me. The red and blue politicians intend to keep groceries expensive for their rich backers.