321
Secret White House spreadsheet ranks US companies based on loyalty to Trump
(www.telegraph.co.uk)
This makes a very good boycott list.
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
321 points (99.4% liked)
politics
25250 readers
1979 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Remember when Democrats did this? Both sides are the same amirite
List?
It won't happen within my lifetime, but I wish I could be alive when all these assholes face the barrel end of a gun in some sort of revolution.
Sadly I give it probably another 50 years to happen, at best, and I'll be long gone.
As will be most of humanity... The future ain't looking great
Yeah, I don't have kids myself and my wife and I have no plans or desire to...
...but we have friends who do and I'm legitimately worried for their future. Or lack thereof. Some think things will "just work out" - but I think that's wishful thinking and dumb.
I'd love to believe otherwise, but I don't think anything short of strategic, aggressive pushback, likely violent at times, will change things.
If we don't start geo engineering real soon... It's all over indeed.
It turns out the DEI favoritism were the fascists we elected along the way.
Of course this guy has an enemies list. That comes in the fascist starter pack.
We really taught him a lesson about quid pro quo, didn't we? As in, he won't ever get in trouble using influence to get anything he wants.
Biden hiring Merrick Garland as AG is probably the thing that ended up putting the final nail in the coffin that was American Democracy. There were literally 100s of crimes to choose from and he just slow walked prosecution on any of them. Still not sure if that's because of cowardice or just loyalty to the Republican party on his part.
All of the above
Susan Collins sure schooled him
social credit american edition
Mr Trump has signed an executive order requiring banks not to discriminate against clients on political ground
.. while also releasing a list of his support for companies ranked on political grounds ..
I'm beginning to suspect this Trump fella might not be on the up and up 🤔
I mean surely the whole article is just a typo and the writer is confused? They can't possibly mean Donald Trump, the failed businessman, failed casino owner, failed university operator, convicted felon and best friend of convicted paedophile Jeffery Epstein is corrupt?!
Its obvious. Trump hires women based on looks and men based on butt sniffing loyalty. Period.
Release the Trump/Epstein files
The upvotes are diminishing. Two more weeks and people will have moved on. It's fascinating to see how the mind works.
Is this hell?
Welcome to the Christian Technate of America!
Nah, just practice
And then, all of a sudden, fairness was achieved because Trump sorted by Column B only.
Let me fix that for you:
The scorecard, which Axios said will aid decision-making ~~on corporate requests~~ by all Americans who wish to avoid the boot lickers
Anyone get the list? I don't want to pay for a list of pay-to-wins
Sadly I don't but would also like to see it if it is available.
How is it that companies won't sue the government after finding out about this list.
And who will enforce the justice against the government?