this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025

1261 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

9413 readers

4449 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.

Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Rooki@lemmy.world

automodbeta@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

Lasherz12@lemmy.world

FauxPseudo@lemmy.world

1261

Let me have a little schadenfreude, as a treat (slrpnk.net)

submitted 1 day ago by infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

154 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Too many people pearl clutching today over worries of retributive violence, as if the fascists aren't already going to be committing that violence on us in the near future regardless. It's not too early to say that this scumbag deserved much worse and I'm glad he got rocked so publicly. Mods I'll understand if you delete this and I'm truly sorry for the trouble if you do, I just need a personal break today from the media cacophony of liberals collectively reconciling with the realization that we live in an abnormally and horrifically violent society.

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] mgnome@piefed.social 127 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I feel like THIS is retributive violence. Democratic politicians were earlier shot dead in their homes, so I'd say that republicans (who are themselves endorsing political violence) shouldn't be able to feel safe either.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Kirk promoted gun violence to justify the 2nd amendment. It would be poetic justice if the killer was someone whose loved one died from gun violence and chose to give him a taste of his own opinion.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 78 points 1 day ago (14 children)

The Republicans are only going to talk about violence against them. They have a victim mentality and Charlie boy is now a martyr.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He is now their Horst Wessel.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago

I hope they all end up being martyrs.

load more comments (12 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

Lol.

So long asshole.

Ran your mouth one day too long.

[–] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Dude, I watched a youtube video of local news stations reporting over the shooting. The youtube comments are completely deranged and 100% written by AI. Somehow charlie kirk is being equated to MLK Jr.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (21 children)

I feel for all the people who will have to live with the fear and trauma of witnessing this. I’m glad nobody else was hurt. This type of violence is a consequence of our gun-obsessed and highly politically polarized culture, which Kirk had a massive hand in making worse. I hope we can focus on the damage his rhetoric has caused and those who were taken in by him can use this as a learning moment.

load more comments (21 replies)

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

They’re already committing violence. It’s just directed against brown people, we shouldn’t forget that. The level they expand and escalate it to is what’s up for debate.

[–] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Fuck around and find out.

Video of Charlie's callous attitude toward the victims of gun violence + him finding out (NSFW NSFL)

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (4 children)

dude had a big face or small face depending on how you define face, i see why the shooter didn't want to overcomplicate and went for the neck

[–] mgnome@piefed.social 64 points 1 day ago

If he got shot in the head - no vital organs would've been hit tho.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have to admit, the Republicans were right about the second amendment. We need to be (legally) buying guns and (legally) protesting with them.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] cm0002@piefed.world 56 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Not gushing anymore https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c206zm81z4gt?post=asset%3A7e2f698a-fcc0-41b0-84ac-b7e01c1d6d56#post

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 97 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It was while he was being asked about gun violence that he was shot, the student says.

Unbelievable.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 106 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Specifically, he was in the middle of spinning a question about mass shootings into a dog whistle about "gang violence".

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

mass shootings committed by trans people, specifically

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 97 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The order of events as I've been seeing online:

Videos circulating on social media showed an attender at the student event on Wednesday asking Charlie Kirk: “Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?”

In response, Kirk said: “Too many,” as the crowd clapped.

In a follow-up question, the attender asked: “Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years?”

Kirk replied: “Counting or not counting gang violence?”

His last act on earth was cracking a joke about how only queers and poors are involved in gun violence, at which point he was shot.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 20 hours ago

Also while sitting in a tent plastered in "prove me wrong"

[–] icylobster@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for extra context. These people really don't seem to care about others suffering. Also I don't normally hear gang violence and mass shooters together. Gang violence is generally targeted and not focused on the most amount of bodies.

Regardless I'm getting tired of this all, and it's likely only beginning.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a regularly used debate tactic of the right. He was going to imply that whatever number the student came up with for mass shootings was inflated because the criteria was too vague and erroneously counts gang violence. He would then have used this to simultaneously downplay the seriousness of mass shootings and suggest that trans people represent a larger proportion of mass shooters than they actually do. It was his way of discrediting the argument that the student was making; that trans people are actually underrepresented in the population of mass shooters. The reason for the student making this argument - if you don't know - is that Charlie Kirk has blamed trans people for mass shootings in the past, jumping on the conservative bandwagon that always transvestigates mass shooters because they believe they are a trans conspiracy.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago

Some of you will die, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to hhh-uh-kkuggg...

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago

I give up. Are they gonna post the answer later? How does this work?

[–] molestme247@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Could have happened a better person, but I'll take whatever we get

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments