this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
413 points (97.9% liked)

politics

31119 readers
2939 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"There are 15 million illegal aliens," Miller said adding that "if each were given a full trial, deportations would take centuries"

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said in a video that went viral on Friday that undocumented immigrants are not entitled to due process protections when being removed from the United States, arguing that providing full legal proceedings would make deportations unworkable.

"There are 15 million illegal aliens," Miller said. "If each were given a full trial, deportations would take centuries. They had no due process entering the country, and they are not entitled to it when being removed."

Supreme Court precedent has long held that constitutional protections apply to noncitizens within U.S. territory. In Wong Wing v. United States (1896), the Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment's due process clause protects noncitizens from arbitrary detention or punishment.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Every time I see that horrible fuck’s face I wish for horrible fates to befall him that I will not put in print.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 months ago

Not how anything works.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago

Ah, the land of the free welcoming the tired, heartbroken and poor huddled masses yearning for that freedom?

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Wouldn't it be nice if people like shithead steve could have their faces melt like the Nazi in Indiana Jones?

[–] core@leminal.space 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

15 million? Got some sauce to back up that claim?

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

That will be soon jump up to the number of Latinos, then Latinos+Asians, then Latinos+Asians+Blacks...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 7 points 8 months ago

if each were given a full trial, deportations would take centuries

Yeah, that's kind of the point. You don't deport people out of spite or because it serves your agenda.

They had no due process entering the country, and they are not entitled to it when being removed.

Whatever that means. I'm not a scholar in matters of law, but I guess that Miller's opinion is as valuable as single ply toilet paper.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

Bring us yo huddled masses

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

He's wrong and should feel bad. I hope he gets a yeast infection in his urethra.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

15 million! Crikey! Which orifice did he pull that number from?

Edit to add: This quote also enrages me.

“If each were given a full trial, deportations would take centuries."

Then so be it you souless ghoul. Maybe you should take it down a notch or two if you're struggling to achieve your goals. What a absolutely bullshit reason. Does he think anyone would think that's a reasonable excuse?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

He has a huge boil in and on his ass. It's called Stephen Miller

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 8 months ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Cannot wait to see that logic used on him when it comes to his time - he didn't do any of what he did with due process, so no due process is owed him when deciding what to do about his crimes....

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

micropenis confirmed

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Got my tomatoes and strike fund ready, when are we national striking?

[–] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Can he just come out of the closet already? Why take out whatever problems/insecurities/being in the closet or whatever he has out on everyone else?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

He doesn’t deserve lube.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This man is really stupid.

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 3 points 8 months ago
[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Then change the constitution. It's that simple.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›