this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
507 points (91.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

10160 readers
4089 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A lot of replies here (obviously from people not already aware of The Discourse on this point) were genuinely confused variants on "But why, they're right, that's a valid concern." Let me leave a short thread for future readers explaining why that stuff is always unwelcome on here. (1/n)

It's totally understandable if you're dooming about any facet of the American experiment right now. So your feelings are "valid" in the sense that they represent real anxiety, and I get that. But to vent that anxiety in other people's spaces is wrong for three reasons.

First, it's factually wrong. There will be elections in 2026 and 2028 under Trump, just like there were elections last year under Trump and during his first term. This despite one of the two major parties now harboring a lot of anti-democratic elements and ideas.

I'm not particularly interested in convincing anyone on this point and won't try, the future is the future. But if the left side of the political spectrum is still the domain of scholarship and expertise, take note that you don't find scholars and experts you worrying about canceled US elections.

Second, and probably most importantly, it's tactically wrong. "No point discussing political opposition to fascism, there won't be elections anyway" cedes victory to your enemies. It's defeatism and nihilism.

Finally, it's wrong AS A MATTER OF ETIQUETTE. Entering a total stranger's discussion and leading with your private anxiety is as off-putting in social media replies as it would be in real life. If you wouldn't interrupt a stranger at a party to announce that America is doomed, don't do it here.

If you are anxious and sad about the state of the world, that's fine, and there are plenty of strategies for dealing with that. But I think you already know that drive-by online dooming isn't a strategy. It's selfish and adolescent. It's a contagion that only spreads the worst of you, not the best.

Take a second and think before posting the easy Eeyore reply. You might have something substantive to say instead. Or, even better, you can say nothing at all.

https://bsky.app/profile/kenjennings.bsky.social/post/3mbuedepurs2x

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago

There will be no midterms. Notice how every single fucking day for years has been "I cannot believe this is happening", and that the breadth and depth of that is only increasing?

This horrible chapter in human history will close, for the better, like every other horrible chapter in human history: with a lot of bloodshed. Should there be political opposition to fascism? Of course. Will that be enough to turn the page? Absolutely not.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Shit give Ken Jennings a position in the next administration. I have no idea what he's qualified for, but I do know for a fact he's good at trivia so he knows some things, and going by this tweet he believes in the rule of law.

Bam, yuh hired. Based on those 2 qualifications alone he's already more qualified for the highest office than 100% of the Nazis in the current administration.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's a game show host. Apparently that qualifies him for the top of the ticket.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

True, I guess if it's a prerequisite we only elect U.S. TV celebrities, Jeopardy is going to be the closest we could hope for to provide somebody remotely qualified. He may be humanities last hope.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

He's super smart, and has morals. He could do anything better than 90% of the current politicians of either party. Hell, I'd vote for him for president over whichever tokens the parties put up on 2028.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Ethical dilemma" of blocking or muting, what a weenie.

Try not caring enough about their opinion to do either, toughen up buttercup

I don't see how it's rude to comment on a public discussion, but yeah I guess if you want to feel like a martyr on social media go right ahead with that.

"Oh my word, another stranger commenting on my commenting about someone else commenting. I have the vapors!"

Take your own advice and say nothing at all. See? No comments about your no comment. Peace will descend upon you, gentle soul.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I agree with Ken, but disagree with his reasons (in particular I think hiis first point is wrong) Here's mine:

  • Doomerism like this is a self fulfilling prophecy, you are giving them permission to do the thing and discouraging the many people fighting to try and make the next election happen properly.
  • Most autocratic nations have elections, they just aren't fair or free. American elections have never been completely fair, but have also been declining rapidly. The original statement thus promotes a dangerous false dichotomy ("see nothing to worry about, we had an election those gosh darn fear mongers don't know what they are talking about")
  • It's not productive. Your belief that there will be an election in November or in 2028 should not change any of your behavior, it's simply a demoralizing statement with no call to action, that is the opposite of what american freedom fighters need. Ultimately all it accomplishes is to make a bunch of anti-facists dislike Ken for making anti-facist statements.
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lily white rich cishet celebrity throwing toxic positivity at everyone nearer to the business end of the "then they came for" list than he is. Surprised he's not singing "Imagine."

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think it is toxic positivity to identify a problem, wants a course of action to fix it, and pushes back on people saying don't do it because it is too hard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'm not a doomer about having elections. We repeat the same dismal spiral and the shitshow that is election season is an important part of making me hate living with all of you even more every year.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I find it helps to ask what is the intention. If it is to just unload negative feelings and there is no effort to build something after dumping those emotions, then the intention is to dissipate energy. IMHO it is better to hold those emotions and unpack them in a space where the energy can be harnessed into something more useful than venting. Even a rage room is healthier and more productive for instance.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's amazing how angry people get when someone reminds us that we don't have to take the extreme position on everything all the time

[–] qualia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

I'm mildly interested in the prosecute the current regime candidate, but I would rather vote for the make all of their delusions of persecution real candidate.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›