this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
11 points (92.3% liked)

Canada

10911 readers
912 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Canadian arm of the Chinese state-owned energy giant has a half-interest in the Grand Rapids Pipeline, with Calgary-based South Bow Corp. holding the rest. Grand Rapids runs 460 kilometres between the oilsands region in northeastern Alberta and the Edmonton area.

PetroChina was seeking to acquire South Bow's interest under an option contained in their agreement that includes a 30-day time limit, said an Alberta Court of King's Bench written decision posted online last week.

"The proverbial fly-in-the-ointment is the requirement of two governmental authorizations," wrote Justice Douglas Mah, who rendered his oral decision in December.

"First, because of the size and nature of the transaction, dispensation is required under the Competition Act ... Second, because PetroChina is a Chinese state-owned enterprise, its acquisition of South Bow's interest in the pipeline must undergo a net benefit review under the Investment Canada Act ... Both of these authorizations take time to get."

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago

All of this infrastructure should be publicly owned by Canada but alas... Otherwise we only get stuck with the negative externalities.

[–] eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I am glad they were met with Government barriers. I don't want the pipeline to be owned by a Chinese company at all but I know nothing of the agreement made when building the pipeline.

Though given how the Rogers / Shaw merger went forward despite objections by relevant bodies I somewhat doubt the acquisition will be stopped.