this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
206 points (100.0% liked)

politics

27280 readers
2644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Former GOP strategist Rick Wilson unleashed a scathing attack Monday on Donald Trump, calling the former president a threat to American democracy itself, and making the case for forcible removal if Trump doesn't willingly leave.In a fiery piece titled "Declaration of Independence From The Mad King,"...

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 83 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (4 children)

What alarms me most is how none of the warnings are heeded or heard by lawmakers. Nobody can do anything about it.

Let's say he doesn't suspend elections in November. Let's say we flip both the House and the Senate. Does anybody honestly believe they'll enact restrictions, precautions, or any other measures to prevent something like this from happening again? Sure, there will be a couple of things passed... But nobody will go to jail, no enforcement will happen, nothing.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I've said it before, the damage has been done, the current status quo will not go away.

Flip the house, flip everything, at best the regime will ignore it all ...

In the short term there will be no repercussions for the regime to go on unhindered. Heck they already mostly ignore congress as it is right now.

2028 will not bring a peaceful transition, ALL those in power now can't afford to let it go, not only will it ruin their plans if they do, it will also bring possible criminal investigations into their self enrichment and other damaging actions. There can not be a single scapegoat so the pact will stay close to protect the whole.

The only ones to bring this all to a sudden halt with the least victims and uproar is the army, and then the whining starts:
"I was just following orders".

If by a miracle the regime does fall unexpectedly I expect a carte blanche pardon for those in control now.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I suspect the population needs to see nothing happen if they vote in a blue wave, and I suspect it’s going to need to get worse.. not that I don’t support voting, but right now there’s still too much faith that the system will correct itself. If you aren’t constantly consuming political news, you might think the lip service is actually doing something, and with the constant barrage of shit, people can honestly be forgiven too since extent for not knowing exactly how things are playing out with challenges and stuff.

It would be nice if it did correct course with voting, but I don’t think it will. At least not without a bigger shakeup (like actually progressives in place of dinos, flipping gerrymandered red districts, etc.) than 2026 midterms are likely to deliver..

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Do you know why Republicans do exactly what the regime wants? It's because Trump has a cult, that is exceedingly violent and unhinged. They threaten to murder their congresspeople, rape their wives, kill their children, burn their houses down. I'm not even kidding, look it up for yourself. Straight domestic terrorism stuff. Many Republicans are acting out of fear of their constituents, and it's extremely effective. So...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What I'm hearing is that the politicians need to be made even more scared of the rest of us.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

lol that's one interpretation

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 9 points 20 hours ago

The worst part is that they fucking knew this long before it was a problem you could actually point at.

They were warned, they just thought they wouldn't be in front of the barrel and they thought they were sacrificing you and I instead of themselves, you, and I.

Fuck them, they deserve the fear.

[–] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Exactly both sides are equally complicit In this coup and need to be treated as such. They need to be walked to the trials all together

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 13 hours ago

Trump is clearly fucking incapacitated. He needs to be removed under the 25th amendment. But what I see is either an utter lack of strategy, or a strategy of letting the republicans hang themselves (and all U.S. legitimacy along with it) in favor of letting things get to point where a midterm sweep seems likely. Ineptitude or callous political math. Feels like a greasy handshake from someone you know just spent all day alone.

[–] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 23 hours ago

Like they are actively and maliciously forfeiting their oath to protect the constitution and should be tried for treason

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 14 points 20 hours ago

In September 2016, Michael Anton wrote an essay for the right-wing Claremont Institute, “The Flight 93 Election,” making the case for Donald Trump’s election as a necessary gamble to stave off the destruction of conservatism. Anton then did a stint in Trump’s National Security Council, and last night was rewarded by the president with a posting to the National Board for Education Sciences. It was a fitting coda for Trump to single out the figure who most perfectly captured the spirit that right-wing intellectuals brought to the era.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/michael-antons-flight-93-election-trump-coup.html

Republicans said Trump was necessary to save the republic, this is funny

[–] fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org 25 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Hey guys? Um, remember the time when Trump was impeached twice? Yeah, I wonder who didn't want him impeached.

YOU DIDN'T!!

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Republican senators just were asked to say "yes" to convict for an obvious insurrection and if they did, Trump would have been constitutionally barred from even running for president again.

One word. That's all they needed to offer. They have proven they literally will not spend a single word to save democracy.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 12 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Consider this scenario:

  • In 2028, Trump gets the red states to back his place on the ballot, and he bullies enough swing states into recognizing him as eligible.
  • Trump wins. Congress certifies. SCOTUS rules that Trump's third term is valid.
  • The blue states that didn't put Trump on the ballot declare that the executive branch is considered vacant until a new election can be held. No new bill turned into law will be recognized (since they would have to pass Trump's desk in the process), Trump isn't allowed to federalize the National Guard since he isn't the legitimate President, any new executive orders are null and void, etc.
  • New Nullification Crisis begins, except bigger.
  • SCOTUS attempts to use Cooper v Aaron to strike down Nullification. States argue that they're nullifying laws that had no legal standing when they were passed anyway due to Trump's involvement in the bill -> law process.
  • Trump will no doubt try to activate the National Guard to arrest the Nullification advocates. Then things might get tricky.

Of course, this is all assuming that Dems don't immediately cave, and stand by Amendment 22.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

First there'll be a media campaign with ppl shouting "let him finish". Get his magats riled up against all who oppose a 3rd term.

The elections most likely will have highly suspicious numbers, but that will be covered up or ignored happily.

And when he slithers into his 3rd term his regime is from then on glued to the desk... I still suspect the term king will be used, perhaps they think that gives him the 3rd term loophole :-)

Trump will use his "ICE" army to terrorize anyone against his regime untill he is sure the Insurrection act will stick and he can let the national guard start shooting with live ammo...

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Honestly, I would expect a new Nullification Crisis much sooner than 2028, sooner even than midterms, inasmuch as the federal government, under this regime, is literally waging war -- or trying very hard to start a real one -- against the state of Minnesota, among others. A state could easily say, "Enough!" long before November rolls around.

I'm not saying Walz would do this, but hypothetically, a state that has enough of this federal incursion that finds no real respite in the courts, or finds itself being actively bankrupted or otherwise destroyed, could simply start nullifying the most onerous orders, or really, any federal orders, because at that point, restraint would make no real difference, as hypothetically every other imaginable remedy would already have been tried. Its exercise would hypothetically be the step immediately prior to secession, probably discussed directly as such, and like 1832 before it, the direct cause would likely be financial because unlike then, today the executive is already engaging in the use of force against a state.

The interesting thing, to me, is that the Nullification Crisis ended peacefully and fairly quickly in spite of the Force Bill because at the end of the day, both parties strove to find a solution that would preserve the union. Andrew Jackson being marginally less shitty and somewhat more sane than the current executive, they succeeded in that, so the Force Bill was never relied upon to use military might against a state's nullification.

That is NOT the case here. In fact, we're already past it. There have already been National Guard troops in the streets, on orders that were subsequently deemed unlawful by the courts, and we haven't even really gotten near the federal defiance of Posse Comitatus and/or formally using the Insurrection Act yet, events that are almost certain to come as well. The fed does NOT want peace: if it can push a state to open fighting it will, and as far as I can see is already working strenuously to that end wherever it can. So from where I'm sitting, at that final point of provocation, whatever it ends up being, state nullification doesn't look very much different from secession at all, either in execution or federal response to same.

Also, not really on topic but I'm just going to throw in a gentle reminder that it would take no more than a handful of Republicans in the House and Senate to put a stop to all this madness TODAY. That's not an absolute majority, of course, but it is more than enough to rein in that tertiary syphilitic madness enough to make the threats to both domestic and international targets stop instantly.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

this is all assuming that Dems don’t immediately cave

That bit sounds implausible.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 5 points 22 hours ago

True, but that wouldn't be very interesting to think about. A couple states might try to nullify if they're pissed off enough. And nullification depends on the state government rather than the federal government, so the likes of Jeffries and Schumer wouldn't be a concern.

[–] jim@lemmy.org 0 points 22 hours ago

It’s martial law in October 2026, he will have full control by the end of the year.

[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 21 hours ago

To be fair Rick mostly borrowed the language of the 1776 Declaration. I like it.