this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
225 points (99.1% liked)

politics

28845 readers
1793 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In other words, to remove the president using the impeachment process, the forces of sanity would need to muster a two-thirds majority in the Senate. To remove the president under the 25th Amendment, they would need to do it in both houses.

Don’t kid yourself, folks: There is no magic bullet here. There is no constitutional magic bullet. There is no investigative or prosecutorial magic bullet—no Robert Mueller or Jack Smith. There is no combination of protests and elections or lobbying that can make this problem go away quickly.

There is, instead, a long hard slog ahead of us—a long hard slog of elections, advocacy, protest, litigation, and people fighting for their rights.

And there is a long hard slog ahead of Europe too in handling the disaster the United States has unleashed on the world. Because that is what managing a deranged person is like.

... This was long before George Conway wrote his famous Atlantic article about Trump’s malignant narcissism. Trump’s mental health was not a subject it was considered appropriate to discuss—at least not in a serious way, and I’m not a clinician, and Lawfare is not a medical or psychological journal. And yet, even then—eight months before he was elected the first time—there was “the small matter of Trump’s—there’s no polite way to say this—evident clinical symptoms. I’m not a psychologist qualified to make a diagnosis, but it simply has to be significant that it’s hard to have a serious conversation about Trump without using words like egomania, grandiosity, or narcissism.”

There was no escaping it. He was deranged—grandiose, egomaniacal, narcissistic, the sort of man who would get obsessed with acquiring Greenland and blow up America’s most sacred international commitments to get it done. The sort of man who would respond to not getting the Nobel Peace Prize by declaring he was no longer solely interested in peace. The sort of man who would take the medal from its rightful winner and feel no shame at the theft.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 107 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There is no magic bullet here.

A regular bullet works fine.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I will continue to post this every time someone insinuates that someone else should murder Trump/ICE Agents/ etc.

In the US we have the Second Amendment. The fascists have been the ones screaming and yelling about the Second Amendment, but the truth is that all Americans have the right.

Owning a gun isn't enough. Driving to Cabela's and picking up a vermin killing .22 is not enough. You should buy a proper rifle, a pistol, and a knife. (Bonus points for a shotgun) Then you need to train with said rifle, pistol and knife. Go to a range and shoot. Look for local self defense/hand to hand combat with knife classes and train.

I am not advocating for violence...far from it. But I am advocating for knowledge because owning a weapon and not knowing how to use it is a recipe for disaster.

PS: If you can afford it, buy suppressors. Especially for your rifles. Suppression for the common citizen isn't about stealth like in the movies, it is about protecting your hearing. Guns are LOUD. Much louder than you expect.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most people who've never fired a gun vastly overestimate how far they can accurately shoot too. As someone who teaches newcomers let me just say a newcomer who can keep their bullets on target even at just 15 meters is rare. And with pistols, forget it, most newcomers need to start within 5 meters to be able to see where all their shots landed.

[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think it’s better to leave the knife. Learn how use and to defend against batons/Tonfas/clubs. „Law“ enforcement uses sticks and guns, because they are relatively easy to use without putting yourself in too much danger.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Best advice i heard was that nobody wins a knife fight.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Oh I heard slightly different, the loser dies in the fight, the winner dies in the ambulance.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 14 points 1 month ago

Yeah.... Pretty much anyone proclaiming to be an expert knife fighter is just a chud playing make believe.

The only way to win a knife fight is to be the only person with a knife, and you really don't need a lot of lessons about stabbing an unarmed victim.

I work in my state's only trauma 1 ward..... Attacking someone with a knife is not a quick or effective way to kill someone. If the other person has a knife as well, you are also going to get stabbed a bunch.

Pepper spray is what I would put in a kit instead. I would argue having some kind of cutting edge is a good tool to have, just not for self defense.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

You’re not arguing for violence. You’re arguing for effective violence

[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 7 points 1 month ago

Canadian should take the hint about arming and training themselves we have little time before they try to make a move and let’s be real canadian army will stand between 2 day and 1 week max the rest will be a war of sabotage and guerrila tactic which will/should include the non maple maga citizen

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 1 month ago

The medically correct term is lead therapy.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I maintain that the best possible scenario is that he dies of natural causes, on live television. They don't get a scapegoat, the cult of personality disintegrates and they are unable to retain masses of voters because of it.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Best case Ontario he Budd Dwyer's himself

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That actually would be better, thanks for that! That would imply he knows he's guilty and wants to get out of the punishment xD

Not that narcissists ever admit guilt tho

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

Dwyer went out calling for the justice system to be reformed because he was still proclaiming his innocence.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

To anyone unfamiliar, don't go watching any videos without first reading what you're going to be watching.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Nah, they will just claim he'll respawn in 3 days, then keep changing the deadline when it continues to not happen.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

I'll settle for televised and immensely painful

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Nah. I think the best scenario is that Vance gets a big ego and 25ths him at some point. That would destroy MAGA and completely kill the almost non existent political capital Vance has.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He may be deranged, and he probably is, but Trump does not want Greenland for spurious reasons. Pretending that this whole situation is unfolding just because he's Ol' Mr. Sillypants is exceedingly dangerous. Trump wants Greenland because Putin wants Trump to take it, and the inevitable fallout will also lead to the US withdrawing from NATO. As it stands now, Putin cannot pass his navy through into the north Atlantic without it easily being blockaded by NATO from the coast of Greenland to the coast of Norway.

Having half of that stretch of ocean conveniently occupied by nearby US ships instead which is conveniently currently nonagressive with Russia would be very beneficial for Putin.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As long as he's alive the republican party will keep wheeling him out there to yell at clouds and brown people.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I thought the 25th only needs a majority of the cabinet plus the VP to invoke. Honestly less likely than getting 2/3 of congress on board.

[–] OldFartPhil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

From what I've read, that only applies if the President is incapacitated (presumably temporarily). He can re-assume the office just by saying that he's ready to return to the job. Removing a President who claims he's able to hold the office require a 2/3 majority of both the House and Senate.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

He can re-assume the office just by saying that he’s ready to return to the job.

I thought that too. But there's a provision for the cabinet-plus-VP to say "nuh-huh" after he claims he's fit, at which point Congress decides even if the President objects.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

It has to be approved by a supermajority of both houses of Congress.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Not enough decent people in washington. Too many multiterm parasites that only care about their bank accounts to do anything moral or decent.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm sorry, is this from 2019?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is easy. Have him draw a time on a clock on live TV.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Seriously, Mr. Stable Genius should have no issue drawing an analog clock.

Hell, at this point — he probably can't even draw a god damn digital clock.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I predict Vance, et. al. will be doing an effective 25nd Amendment move after the midterms--not needing to actually invoke it but threatening trump with it if he doesn't play along with their plans. There are lots of ways to manipulate him with both carrots and sticks. Assuming repubs keep their majority in Congress, (see the next paragraph), trump will conveniently have a health crisis that forces him to "retire" next year. Of course he might go ahead and have one without help anyway, but this is assuming he doesn't.

The wild card is how the midterms will go, which I can't predict. Will they be free and fair "normal" elections? I seriously doubt it. Lots of red states have one or two blue House seats. Repub-majority red states have been working on stacking election boards and judges ever since 2020 and they're ready. They'll make sure those blue House seats turn red, no redistricting is even needed, just manipulation of the voting process--purging the voter rolls on the front end and not counting as many ballots as needed on the back end.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've been expecting Vance to invoke the 25th two years and one month into Trump's term for a while. I think it was really telling that nobody wanted to be Trump's runningmate until his dementia got obviously much worse, then everyone raced to get it, including Vance.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yep, the only reason I say they'll more likely just threaten him with it to make him "voluntarily" step down is that his followers would rebel against Vance if he outright power ousts him with the 25th.

But I think he (actually they, the whole cadre that are running things) will go ahead and actually invoke it if trump refuses to cooperate. It'll just take more work--either a propaganda effort of video clips, rumors, leaks of "doctor reports" and "off-camera incidents", etc. to convince his cult that he really is unable to continue, or more likely something might just "unfortunately happen" to him. They just have to make sure the magats don't smell a rat and turn on them.

Oh, and the reason to wait until beginning of next year is so Vance will be able to run for two more full terms.