this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
285 points (99.3% liked)

politics

27280 readers
2346 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link: https://archive.ph/7zdMu

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I love that we're finally getting to general strikes, but they're gonna keep doing them right? And not just on Fridays? (especially when the said Friday is already going to not be busy as it's going to be below 0F (high of - 7F)

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 hours ago

In that weather a general strike is more sane than a march. It will also be harder for police/ICE to disrupt, what are they gonna run house to house ordering people to work? Every food venue should be closed, and especially anywhere they're staying should have no employees that day. These are the guys who kidnapped the men who had just made and served them Mexican food.

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I agree that announcing an end date for a general strike removes a lot of the threat that a general strike implies, and limits its effectiveness. I’m really holding out for just getting a bunch of people who wouldn’t normally take the day off work to go protest out into the streets to meet the real organizers. I think there are a lot of people who want to do something to help Minnesota from outside the state but don’t know what, and “go grocery shopping on Thursday after work and call in sick to work on Friday” is a very concrete and achievable goal.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Is this the one they originally said 10 days?

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

I think you could strike for ten days too. I think they’d be okay with that.

I bet they’d be pumped if you struck indefinitely.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I can hope with all that's going on that they'll get more people interested, just the cold gonna be a blocker. Midwesterns know cold, but it's gonna be very hard to stay out for those that picket.

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The cold is not a blocker! It’s super easy to stay home from work, school and shopping when it’s super cold out. Most of the actual meetings are via zoom

Edit: here’s one if anyone’s interested: Attend a workshop Whether you're union or non-union, attend our upcoming virtual No Work Workshop, co-hosted by EWOC, on January 20th at 8pm. We'll teach you how to start conversations and organize with your coworkers in MN! QR code with caption "Join us virtually on Tuesday, January 20th!

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We will get a four day work week by any means necessary

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 hours ago

We have AI, why not have it just take one of the 5 days?

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 14 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

A strike with an end date is not a strike

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

That's categorically not true. Strikes with end dates are utilized as shows of force by actual, serious unions, to put pressure on the company without the same level of economic damage. They should never be the end goal, or the final strike, but they can be a good starting place to measure support.

This is a way that if it's successful, they can plan much longer strikes in the future successfully and better know how far they can leverage power.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

This lowers the bar of entry to acclimatize people to a future indefinite strike. Is one day of action going to be enough? Most people know, probably not, but if for whatever reason it is, great! Otherwise of course people will be at it longer and with better preparation.

Examples of strikes in Canada

There are examples of strikes that come about too quickly that don’t bring about change. All my examples here are Canadian because solidarity strikes are banned in the US due to Taft Hartley and rugged individualism has made Americans not really test it en masse.

One day strikes have made big impacts in the past as well, like in BC in the 1980s.

One of the biggest and most successful strikes in Canada, yet very rarely talked about appears to me as the Québec 1972 strike. It followed many years of unrest including the October Crisis of 1970, where the Prime Minister put down separatist militias. It didn't just randomly happen, it took months of planning and preparation, long exposure to a repressing force, and a populace with a mind and purpose for collective action.

The point being, complaints like this come across to me as shallow and unthoughtful. Each of these actions are a step towards a stronger, more robust resistance that with each additional participant become more difficult for any fascist administration put down. They keep doubling down but they are failing miserably to achieve their aims, which was ostensibly to subjugate and silence the people of Minnesota. I ask you to nurture and encourage people showing solidarity instead of writing it off as insufficient.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

That's how I felt about the Reddit protests. (Also that a sub going private was counterproductive, but that's another issue)

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -1 points 10 hours ago

Seriously. You’re supposed to strike until you get what you are demanding. Otherwise its just… nothing.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Are people in other states planning on participating in this? I'm definitely in

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Yes from Colorado, several of my friends are joining. I already don’t work on Fridays (and I own my own business anyway), so my contribution is to not buy anything or eat out.

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

I for sure am.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Do it, nothings stopping you from doing it constantly even.

Hurt the economy and stack paper, although I do advocate for people buying guns these days if you haven't yet.

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago

Minnesota is and you can too

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm newly retired and I'm in San Diego, but fucked if I'm spending any money that day.

[–] pootzapie@lemy.lol 3 points 8 hours ago

Hey congratulations! ignoring the world for a sec, I hope you have a good retirement