this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
212 points (99.5% liked)

politics

28709 readers
2412 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/42033604

Sat 17 Jan 2026 08.00 EST

Two protesters have been blinded by so-called “less-lethal” munitions deployed by federal officers during an anti-ICE protest last week in Santa Ana, California, according to reports.

Widely seen video recorded at the Santa Ana protest showed a homeland security agent shoot Kaden Rummler, 21, in the face with a less-lethal munition at a distance of only a few feet. Doctors found glass shards and plastic fragments in his skull and a fragment of metal lodged just shy of his carotid artery.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jim@lemmy.org 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Can we shoot them with less lethal munitions?

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're harder to get than the lead-based alternatives.

[–] jim@lemmy.org 8 points 1 month ago

Good point. In this economy we have to be thrifty.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In a practical sense, yes. Will you die? Also yes.

[–] jim@lemmy.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We don’t actually know they are good shots. They are also very large targets. Even American hero Tommy “iron sights” Crooks could hit that barn.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] jim@lemmy.org 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah but… close range. If you catch my drift.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Does this not fly in the face of the First Amendment - why are conservatives not mad about this as well?

Those shot seem to have been protesting peacefully with no weapons or military protective gear on public lands, and then ICE walked into them and pulled a protester away, intentionally escalating conflict, then firing into a protesters face at about 2ft away.

Insane that there is still no general strike over ICE (and more).

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does this kid have a go fund me?

[–] sensualsunset@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Damn, while he needs medical bills covered, I was hoping he would have a legal fund. That kid needs to sue the shit out of them.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The kid should win.

After the kid got their money, the real justice should begin. The officers should get the Good-treatment themselves.

[–] sensualsunset@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Rummler is 5ft 1in tall and weighs 102lbs, he said." absolutely disgusting and pathetic. thugs.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 5 points 1 month ago

Time to bring back the old "eye for an eye" form of justice.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I saw the video where the “officer” held their “non-lethal” weapon right up to the face of a non-violent protester and fired. This was clearly intentional and should be treated as such. There is no legitimate complaint about qualified immunity (and no, claiming total immunity doesn’t mean that is legal) or that he didn’t know. This was intent to cause major harm for no reason other than someone disagreed. It was horrible and any actual law and order would impose significant jail time and reparations