this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
213 points (95.7% liked)

196

4425 readers
1045 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

LPT: good cops are actually hired every year, in a specific date. Bastards in the other days.

That date is the 30th of February, by the way.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 hours ago

Not gonna lie, you had me in the first half!

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

Oh, so now the tolerant left hates an equitable workplace? /s

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 6 hours ago

Not sure if this cross-posted correctly or not, but come join us at !acab@quokk.au if you want an anti-police community that's not moderated by the notorious JordanLund! 😊

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 3 points 4 hours ago

Dr. Seuss got kinda dark in the later days

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago

It's okay to say they're better off dead, this is what they do to Fred Hampton's grave.

[–] cookedonchems@lemmy.zip -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

So a good cop should quit instead of turning in the bad cops? Which would effectively just be ignoring the problem and solve nothing.

if the good cops were going to turn int he bad cops you would have heard about it by now.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

One might wonder where all the supposed good cops reporting bad cops are then? 🧐

[–] cookedonchems@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Few and far between, admittedly.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't that seem like maybe there aren't actually any good cops currently on the force?

[–] cookedonchems@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

No. And I’ll explain— I personally know a few good cops that have made reports against cops for breaking their oath. Two of which were excessive use of force. Do you know where those reports went? Straight to the trash because the “bad cop” knew more of the higher ups than the good cop that reported them. So what is the good cop supposed to do then? It takes way more than just one or two good cops reporting the bad ones. The people above them have to take the reports seriously. And I think that’s where the good cop credibility gets tossed out the window.

What are your honest thoughts on this? Id love for this to be an actual conversation and not a pissing argument of going back and forth.

[–] wilder@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I know a few cops too.

The problem with ‘good cop’ logic is that after a while it becomes a distinction without a difference because of what you just described. Eventually the system grinds them down and they either quit or accept it for what it is.

So maybe the more accurate sentiment would be “cops either quit with their principles intact or fall in line because the system doesn’t allow ‘good cops’ to stay that way” but it’s a little bit clunkier than the shorthand.

[–] cookedonchems@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I would say that’s pretty spot on actually.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That still means ACAB is true. They either quit (no longer a cop) or they become a bastard. "Good" cops that haven't reached either of those outcomes yet are just Schrödinger's Cop.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

There's no such thing as a good cop that contributes to maintaining the current status quo, and if you're on the force, then that's what you're doing. Including very simply by being tools for people to point too and say "look, good cops exist" which is what you seem to be doing here.

[–] cookedonchems@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

And that’s where this conversation will end. Because you seem to be of the mindset that all cops are bad no matter what. Good day to you.

[–] kevinsbacon@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

Do you think there is ever a situation where a Nazi is a good person?

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

Yes, I believe that ACAB is true, I thought as much was obvious. Have a good day though! 💜