this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
154 points (98.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3310 readers
921 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A mass “doxing” effort to track down, intimidate and harass people perceived not to have sufficiently mourned the killing of the rightwing activist Charlie Kirk was endorsed on Monday by JD Vance.

The US vice-president guest-hosted Kirk’s podcast on Monday and said that people who “see someone celebrating Charlie’s murder” should “call them out”. He added: “Hell, call their employer. We don’t believe in political violence, but we do believe in civility, and there is no civility in the celebration of political assassination.”

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

The right are violent psychopaths. Get armed cos all they want to do is harm you

[–] dumbass@aussie.zone 4 points 8 hours ago

I live in Australia you failed cum stain, come get me.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

The world is objectively a better place with Charlie Kirk firmly in the cold, cold ground.

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Hey man, nice shot.

[–] groovyplane@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Is Vance taking grooming tips from 'Pedro' Hedgehog now.!? Apnews

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Well then. If doxxing is OK now, time to unmask the ICE agents.

Also Charlie Kirk was a shit stain and I'm glad he's dead.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 53 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

How is it not a violation of the first Amendment for the Vice President to go after people for their speech?

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 34 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, it totally is, but the Supreme Court has already shown they will rubber-stamp anything this administration does, so there's not really anyone that can stop it.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 8 points 18 hours ago

there’s not really anyone that ~~can~~ will stop it.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 7 points 19 hours ago

The VP isn't going after people in this instance. He's saying that civilians going after people is cool with him.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Oh look, Vance is honoring Kirk's memory by also being a violence encouraging piece of shit. How thoughtful of him.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

honoring Kirk's memory would be advocating for executing the president (throw in the VP for good measure) for his crimes against America

https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-joe-biden-should-be-put-prison-andor-given-death-penalty-crimes-against

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 31 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

JD Vance is afraid of American women

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

That's why he opts for couches. They don't talk back.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

But honestly, take note of my point, and let all women know it. Trump, Vance, McConnell, etc. all of them take foreign wives

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 7 points 21 hours ago

He likes the bigger ones, more cushion for the push'n.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I really think that Vance's defining characteristic is that he's an asshole.

Yeah, to some degree he's power-hungry and to some degree he's greedy and to some (minor) degree he's an ideologue and so on, but I think when it really gets down to it - if you dig all the way down to the core of his personality - he's just a plain old tedious, obnoxious, punchable asshole. And probably has been his entire life.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

hes nothing more than THIEL's attack dog, that thiels allows un-leashed from time to time to run interference for trump.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 23 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Boss, Fascists are fascists.

You're now in the “Tell on your neighbor” part of fascism. Time to insurrect.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I will pay for a front row seat to watch 8chan consume the entire MAGA movement with memes and swatting.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So 4 chan was all we heard about back in the day, then someone said that 8 chan was worse. Is there a 16 chan that actually controls the hacker known as 4chan?

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There might even be a 32 chan...

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

Do you think entering that chat makes the screeeeeee sound a dial up router makes?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago

I just wish the founders had put in some kind of . . y'know . . clause or whatever to allow people to prevent this sort of governmental persecution based on beliefs.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 11 points 20 hours ago

American Constitution —>> Amendments ->> Line Item #2

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Blatant Government sponsored terrorism? No?

[–] zombiewarrior@techhub.social 4 points 22 hours ago